[PATCH V3 1/5] ARM: kirkwood: Basic support for DNS-320 and DNS-325

[Jason Cooper]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:32:34PM +0100, Jamie Lentin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:43:24 +0100, Jason Cooper
> <jason at lakedaemon.net> wrote:
> 
> >>In a future land where everything has been converted to devicetree, what
> >>would be best? An option to "Build all kirkwood-based .dtb's", an option
> >>to build all D-link .dtb's, Q-QNAP .dtb's, etc. or an option for each
> >>board? I've not got any strong opinion, so will reformat the above to
> >>whatever is considered best.
> >
> >Based on Grant's comment, I'll probably be working towards a
> >MACH_GLOBALSCALE_DT option to catch dreamplug,sheevaplug,guruplug, etc.
> >Perhaps this should be MACH_BUFFALO_DT?
> >
> 
> Thinking about it, MACH_DNSKW_DT would probably be best. Anything
> more general, e.g. MACH_DLINK_DNS_DT, would also cover the
> orion-based DNS-313/323/343. Presumably there will always be
> differences between kirkwood and orion5x?

Hmm, Well, I think I would prefer MACH_DLINK_KIRKWOOD_DT,
MACH_DLINK_ORION5X_DT.  This way, all the dtb's for a given manf/SoC are
built in one go, and the correct board-dt file is built as well.

So, in my case, I would do MACH_GLOBALSCALE_KIRKWOOD_DT, and
MACH_GLOBALSCALE_ARMADA_DT.

Grant, Arnd, sound sensible?

> Did you mean D-Link, or is there some relationship between Buffalo
> and D-link I'm not aware of? I know Conceptronic sold a ~identical
> device to the DNS-323, but not aware of anything else. You never
> know who truly makes the devices nowadays anyway.

Nope, just a momentary symlink'd /dev/brain -> /dev/random.  Fixed now,
thanks.

thx,

Jason.