[PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Tue Apr 10 12:11:37 EDT 2012
* Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja at ti.com> [120410 06:44]:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> @@ -120,11 +120,63 @@ static void omap_uart_set_smartidle(struct platform_device *pdev) {}
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX
> -static void omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata)
> +
> +#define OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN 28
> +static char rx_pad_name[OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN],
> + tx_pad_name[OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN] __initdata;
> +static struct omap_device_pad default_omap_uart_pads[2] __initdata;
Won't the default_omap_uart_pads get overwritten for each port?
We need that information in the driver too for each port? Why don't you
just allocate bdata.pads in omap_serial_board_init as we now assume it's
needed for each port?
> +static void __init omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata)
> {
> + struct omap_mux_partition *tx_partition = NULL, *rx_partition = NULL;
> + struct omap_mux *rx_mux = NULL, *tx_mux = NULL;
> +
> + if (bdata->id != 2) {
> + snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> + "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx", bdata->id + 1, bdata->id + 1);
> + snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> + "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx", bdata->id + 1, bdata->id + 1);
> + } else {
> + snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> + "uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx", bdata->id + 1,
> + bdata->id + 1);
> + snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> + "uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx", bdata->id + 1,
> + bdata->id + 1);
> + }
This would be simpler with something like this (untested):
char *rx_fmt, *tx_fmt;
int uart_nr = bdata->id + 1;
if (bdata->id == 2) {
rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx";
tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx";
} else {
rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx";
tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx";
}
snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, rx_fmt,
uart_nr, uart_nr);
snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, tx_fmt,
uart_nr, uart_nr);
> + if (omap_mux_get_by_name(rx_pad_name, &rx_partition, &rx_mux) >= 0 &&
> + omap_mux_get_by_name
> + (tx_pad_name, &tx_partition, &tx_mux) >= 0) {
> + u16 tx_mode, rx_mode;
> +
> + tx_mode = omap_mux_read(tx_partition, tx_mux->reg_offset);
> + rx_mode = omap_mux_read(rx_partition, rx_mux->reg_offset);
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if uart is used in default tx/rx mode i.e. in mux mode0
> + * if yes then configure rx pin for wake up capability
> + */
> + if (!(rx_mode & 0x07) && !(tx_mode & 0x07)) {
> + default_omap_uart_pads[0].name = rx_pad_name;
> + default_omap_uart_pads[0].flags =
> + OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_REMUX | OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP;
> + default_omap_uart_pads[0].enable = OMAP_PIN_INPUT |
> + OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> + default_omap_uart_pads[0].idle = OMAP_PIN_INPUT |
> + OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> +
> + default_omap_uart_pads[1].name = tx_pad_name;
> + default_omap_uart_pads[1].enable = OMAP_PIN_OUTPUT |
> + OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> + bdata->pads = default_omap_uart_pads;
> + bdata->pads_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(default_omap_uart_pads);
> + }
> + }
> }
Then looking at omap_serial_board_init, it still looks wrong:
void __init omap_serial_board_init(struct omap_uart_port_info *info)
{
struct omap_uart_state *uart;
struct omap_board_data bdata;
list_for_each_entry(uart, &uart_list, node) {
bdata.id = uart->num;
bdata.flags = 0;
bdata.pads = NULL;
bdata.pads_cnt = 0;
if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);
Why don't you fill the pads for omap2? It has the same pads, although
it does not have the serial wake-up events working.
And why don't you exit if omap_serial_fill_default_pads fails for the
no info case?
Shouldn't it be something like:
if (!info) {
res = omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);
if (!res)
return;
port = NULL;
} else {
port = &info[uart->num];
}
omap_serial_init_port(&bdata, port);
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list