[PATCH 1/3] PATA host controller driver for ep93xx

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 02 April 2012, Rafal Prylowski wrote:
> I think that inheriting from .ata_bmdma_port_ops is quite reasonable.
> Another option would be to inherit from .ata_sff_port_ops and implement
> .qc_issue hook (like in pata_octeon_cf.c), but this way we end up
> reimplementing the same things from libata-sff.c, IMHO. Also, I think
> that it's not possible to write PATA driver without this SFF stuff
> (at least for me - I'm not libata expert).
> I reviewed code paths from all hooks used in ep93xx driver to make sure
> that we use only ep93xx_pata_read/ep93xx_pata_write instead of ioread/iowrite.
> 
Ok, thanks for the confirmation.

	Arnd