Bug in v7_coherent_kern_range() ?

Dirk Behme dirk.behme at googlemail.com
Sun Apr 1 04:50:14 EDT 2012


On 01.04.2012 10:16, Huang Shijie wrote:
> Hi Dirk:
>> Hi Huang Shijie,
>>
>> On 01.04.2012 09:09, Huang Shijie wrote:
>>> Hi Dirk:
>>>> Hi Huang Shijie,
>>>>
>>>> On 01.04.2012 05:21, Huang Shijie wrote:
>>>>> [1] Platform:
>>>>> freescale's IMX6Q(4 cores) , ARM CORTEX-A9
>>>>>
>>>>> [2] kernel:
>>>>> 3.0.15(I have cherry-picked many patches, and the
>>>>> arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
>>>>> is same code with the latest kernel v3.4-rc1)
>>>>> enable SMP, VIPT,
>>>>
>>>> Could you try an unpatched, clean v3.4-rc1 instead?
>>> Sorry, I could not try the v3.4-rc1. Some our bsp drivers are not DT
>>> supported.
>>
>> I think we are not talking about drivers, we are talking about some
>> kernel core code, like cache handling? To test
>> v7_coherent_kern_range() you might not need to many bsp drivers?
> Yes , the gplay will use the vpu driver. But the VPU driver is not in
> the kernel. Without the vpu driver, the gplay can not works.

You could try to disable the vpu driver and check if the issue is 
still there, then.

>>>> What's about your 2.6.38?
>>> 2.6.38 is not a good version to run the imx6q. It losts many our
>>> drivers's patches.
>>>>
>>>> What's about 3.0.26? 3.0.15 seems to miss some maybe relevant
>>>> patches.
>>>>
>>> Our bsp release are based on 3.0.15. so we could not test it on 3.0.26
>>> too.
>>
>> You can. Just give git rebase a try.
> It will be a nightmare to me. We have nearly 1000 patches. I will cost
> me much time to handle the conflicts.

IMHO you will get one easy to solve merge conflict. So it should you 
take < 10min to rebase to 3.0.26. Just try it ;)

>>
>>>>> [3] application:
>>>>
>>>> Could you share a (simple) test case?
>>> The test case is like this:
>>> #gplay xx.avi
>>>
>>> gplay is our own player, such as mplayer.
>>
>> Could you share a (simple) test case? E.g. share 'gplay'? Or try to
>> reproduce your issue with an other test case? E.g. mplayer? Or
>> better anything simpler the community can use to try to reproduce
>> your issue?
> I can email to you the gplay, if you have an imx6q board. you can test
> it.
> I just wish someone give me some advice about this issue.

It would help to use a kernel version and a test case the community 
can use to reproduce.

Best regards

Dirk

> I find the arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h is out of date. So I will
> update it and test it again.
>
> thanks a lot , Dirk.
>
> Huang Shijie
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>>> I just created a script which will play the video files one by one.
>>>
>>> BR
>>> Huang Shijie
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Dirk
>>>>
>>>>> I use our our application which will clone many threads,
>>>>> two threads (assume as A and B) may do the same thing at the same
>>>>> time
>>>>> as the following code:
>>>>>
>>>>> In most of the time, it's ok.
>>>>> But in some unknown situation, cacheflush() failed and one threads
>>>>> (assume A) may hung up in the following code:
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> open("/usr/lib/lib_mp3_dec_arm12_elinux.so.2.10.0", O_RDONLY) = 8
>>>>> read(8,
>>>>> "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0(\0\1\0\0\0\20\35\0\0004\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 512) = 512
>>>>> fstat64(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=56232, ...}) = 0
>>>>> mmap2(NULL, 88032, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE,
>>>>> 8, 0)
>>>>> = 0x2ff0a000
>>>>> mprotect(0x2ff18000, 28672, PROT_NONE) = 0
>>>>> mmap2(0x2ff1f000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
>>>>> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 8, 0xd) = 0x2ff1f000
>>>>> close(8) = 0
>>>>> mprotect(0x2ff0a000, 57344, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>>> mprotect(0x2ff0a000, 57344, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>>> cacheflush(0x2ff0a000, 0x2ff18000, 0, 0x6, 0x2cd03420) = 0 // System
>>>>> hung up here!!!
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [4] kernel log
>>>>> I use "echo t> /proc/sysrq-trigger" to show the tasks's information:
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> multiqueue0:src D 804cd678 0 7328 5963 0x00000001
>>>>> [<804cd678>] (__schedule+0x228/0x760) from [<804d0564>]
>>>>> (__down_read+0xa8/0xe0)
>>>>> [<804d0564>] (__down_read+0xa8/0xe0) from [<800478c4>]
>>>>> (do_page_fault+0xbc/0x480)
>>>>> [<800478c4>] (do_page_fault+0xbc/0x480) from [<8003841c>]
>>>>> (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98)
>>>>> [<8003841c>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98) from [<8003df10>]
>>>>> (__dabt_svc+0x70/0xa0)
>>>>> Exception stack(0xbae37ea8 to 0xbae37ef0)
>>>>> 7ea0: 31e05000 31e1d000 00000020 0000001f 31e05000 31e1d000
>>>>> 7ec0: bfac86b8 31e05000 31e1d000 bae36000 08100075 31e056fc 31e08000
>>>>> bae37ef0
>>>>> 7ee0: 800424a8 8004a1fc 800f0013 ffffffff
>>>>> [<8003df10>] (__dabt_svc+0x70/0xa0) from [<8004a1fc>]
>>>>> (v7_coherent_kern_range+0x20/0x80)
>>>>> [<8004a1fc>] (v7_coherent_kern_range+0x20/0x80) from [<800424a8>]
>>>>> (arm_syscall+0x2a0/0x2c4)
>>>>> [<800424a8>] (arm_syscall+0x2a0/0x2c4) from [<8003e500>]
>>>>> (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c)
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The do_cache_op() has already held the mm->mmap_sem, but
>>>>> v7_coherent_kern_range()
>>>>> cause one page fault during it flush the cache. deadlock! So it
>>>>> hung up
>>>>> in the do_page_fault().
>>>>>
>>>>> [5] questions:
>>>>> Why the v7_coherent_kern_range() can caused the data abort?
>>>>> Is there something wrong about the v7_coherent_kern_range()?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> Huang Shijie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list