Bug in v7_coherent_kern_range() ?
Dirk Behme
dirk.behme at googlemail.com
Sun Apr 1 04:01:41 EDT 2012
Hi Huang Shijie,
On 01.04.2012 09:09, Huang Shijie wrote:
> Hi Dirk:
>> Hi Huang Shijie,
>>
>> On 01.04.2012 05:21, Huang Shijie wrote:
>>> [1] Platform:
>>> freescale's IMX6Q(4 cores) , ARM CORTEX-A9
>>>
>>> [2] kernel:
>>> 3.0.15(I have cherry-picked many patches, and the
>>> arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
>>> is same code with the latest kernel v3.4-rc1)
>>> enable SMP, VIPT,
>>
>> Could you try an unpatched, clean v3.4-rc1 instead?
> Sorry, I could not try the v3.4-rc1. Some our bsp drivers are not DT
> supported.
I think we are not talking about drivers, we are talking about some
kernel core code, like cache handling? To test
v7_coherent_kern_range() you might not need to many bsp drivers?
>> What's about your 2.6.38?
> 2.6.38 is not a good version to run the imx6q. It losts many our
> drivers's patches.
>>
>> What's about 3.0.26? 3.0.15 seems to miss some maybe relevant patches.
>>
> Our bsp release are based on 3.0.15. so we could not test it on 3.0.26
> too.
You can. Just give git rebase a try.
>>> [3] application:
>>
>> Could you share a (simple) test case?
> The test case is like this:
> #gplay xx.avi
>
> gplay is our own player, such as mplayer.
Could you share a (simple) test case? E.g. share 'gplay'? Or try to
reproduce your issue with an other test case? E.g. mplayer? Or better
anything simpler the community can use to try to reproduce your issue?
Best regards
Dirk
> I just created a script which will play the video files one by one.
>
> BR
> Huang Shijie
>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>>> I use our our application which will clone many threads,
>>> two threads (assume as A and B) may do the same thing at the same time
>>> as the following code:
>>>
>>> In most of the time, it's ok.
>>> But in some unknown situation, cacheflush() failed and one threads
>>> (assume A) may hung up in the following code:
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>> open("/usr/lib/lib_mp3_dec_arm12_elinux.so.2.10.0", O_RDONLY) = 8
>>> read(8,
>>> "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0(\0\1\0\0\0\20\35\0\0004\0\0\0"...,
>>>
>>> 512) = 512
>>> fstat64(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=56232, ...}) = 0
>>> mmap2(NULL, 88032, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE,
>>> 8, 0)
>>> = 0x2ff0a000
>>> mprotect(0x2ff18000, 28672, PROT_NONE) = 0
>>> mmap2(0x2ff1f000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
>>> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 8, 0xd) = 0x2ff1f000
>>> close(8) = 0
>>> mprotect(0x2ff0a000, 57344, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>> mprotect(0x2ff0a000, 57344, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>> cacheflush(0x2ff0a000, 0x2ff18000, 0, 0x6, 0x2cd03420) = 0 // System
>>> hung up here!!!
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] kernel log
>>> I use "echo t> /proc/sysrq-trigger" to show the tasks's information:
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>> multiqueue0:src D 804cd678 0 7328 5963 0x00000001
>>> [<804cd678>] (__schedule+0x228/0x760) from [<804d0564>]
>>> (__down_read+0xa8/0xe0)
>>> [<804d0564>] (__down_read+0xa8/0xe0) from [<800478c4>]
>>> (do_page_fault+0xbc/0x480)
>>> [<800478c4>] (do_page_fault+0xbc/0x480) from [<8003841c>]
>>> (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98)
>>> [<8003841c>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98) from [<8003df10>]
>>> (__dabt_svc+0x70/0xa0)
>>> Exception stack(0xbae37ea8 to 0xbae37ef0)
>>> 7ea0: 31e05000 31e1d000 00000020 0000001f 31e05000 31e1d000
>>> 7ec0: bfac86b8 31e05000 31e1d000 bae36000 08100075 31e056fc 31e08000
>>> bae37ef0
>>> 7ee0: 800424a8 8004a1fc 800f0013 ffffffff
>>> [<8003df10>] (__dabt_svc+0x70/0xa0) from [<8004a1fc>]
>>> (v7_coherent_kern_range+0x20/0x80)
>>> [<8004a1fc>] (v7_coherent_kern_range+0x20/0x80) from [<800424a8>]
>>> (arm_syscall+0x2a0/0x2c4)
>>> [<800424a8>] (arm_syscall+0x2a0/0x2c4) from [<8003e500>]
>>> (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c)
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The do_cache_op() has already held the mm->mmap_sem, but
>>> v7_coherent_kern_range()
>>> cause one page fault during it flush the cache. deadlock! So it
>>> hung up
>>> in the do_page_fault().
>>>
>>> [5] questions:
>>> Why the v7_coherent_kern_range() can caused the data abort?
>>> Is there something wrong about the v7_coherent_kern_range()?
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Huang Shijie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list