[PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

[G, Manjunath Kondaiah]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:03:49PM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> Paul/Benoit,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:18:22AM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> > Paul/Benoit,
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 01:19:06PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> > > On 12/3/2010 10:47 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> > > >* Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson at ti.com>  [2010-12-03 09:38:35 +0100]:
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > >>>v7: replaced mutex lock with spin lock. Added use count for controlling
> > > >>>access to sysconfig registers in case if overlapping request/release API's
> > > >>>are used.
> > > >>
> > > >>I'm not sure it should be done here. I'd rather keep that code in
> > > >>the DMA, since this is the only user of that feature.
> > > >
> > > >Are you referring to spin lock or usage count?
> > > 
> > > The spinlock is needed, I was referring to the usage count.
> > > 
> > > That being said, the API proposed by Paul (request/release
> > > ) sound like a get/put, so maybe he had that kind of usage in mind.
> > > 
> > > I'm still not convince it should be done at hwmod API level.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Paul,
> > > Any thoughts on that?
> > 
> > How do we proceed further?
> Gentle reminder!
> 
> Can we please align on this so that DMA sysconfig patches can be
> upstreamed?
> 
> Discussion on this topic can be accessed at:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/372231/
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg39728.html

As there is no response from paul on this topic, I will go ahead with usage
count logic proposed by Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter at nokia.com> at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/366831/
Above logic has got:
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi at nokia.com>

-Manjunath