[PATCH v2] OMAP: use fncpy to copy the PM code functions to SRAM

Jean Pihet jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
Mon Jan 24 12:25:09 EST 2011


Hi,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Dave Martin <dave.martin at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi there, I just spotted a couple of things merging your patch...
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:02 PM,  <jean.pihet at newoldbits.com> wrote:
>> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet at ti.com>
>>
>> The new fncpy API is better suited for copying some
>> code to SRAM at runtime. This patch changes the ad-hoc
>> code to the more generic fncpy API.
>>
>> Tested OK on OMAP3 in low power modes (RET/OFF)
>> using omap2plus_defconfig with !CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL.
>> Compile tested on OMAP1/2 using omap1_defconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet at ti.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.h               |    6 +++---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/sleep.S            |    3 +++
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/sram.S             |    1 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h               |    2 +-
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S        |    2 ++
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S        |    2 ++
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram242x.S         |    3 +++
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram243x.S         |    3 +++
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S         |    1 +
>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h |   14 +++++++++++++-
>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c              |   14 +++++++++-----
>>  11 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.h
>> index 56a6479..cd926dc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.h
>> @@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ extern void allow_idle_sleep(void);
>>  extern void omap1_pm_idle(void);
>>  extern void omap1_pm_suspend(void);
>>
>> -extern void omap7xx_cpu_suspend(unsigned short, unsigned short);
>> -extern void omap1510_cpu_suspend(unsigned short, unsigned short);
>> -extern void omap1610_cpu_suspend(unsigned short, unsigned short);
>> +extern void omap7xx_cpu_suspend(unsigned long, unsigned long);
>> +extern void omap1510_cpu_suspend(unsigned long, unsigned long);
>> +extern void omap1610_cpu_suspend(unsigned long, unsigned long);
>>  extern void omap7xx_idle_loop_suspend(void);
>>  extern void omap1510_idle_loop_suspend(void);
>>  extern void omap1610_idle_loop_suspend(void);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sleep.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sleep.S
>> index ef771ce..c875bdc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sleep.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sleep.S
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>>  */
>>
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850)
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap7xx_cpu_suspend)
>>
>>        @ save registers on stack
>> @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ ENTRY(omap7xx_cpu_suspend_sz)
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730 || CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850 */
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap1510_cpu_suspend)
>>
>>        @ save registers on stack
>> @@ -211,6 +213,7 @@ ENTRY(omap1510_cpu_suspend_sz)
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX */
>>
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX)
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap1610_cpu_suspend)
>>
>>        @ save registers on stack
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sram.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sram.S
>> index 7724e52..692587d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sram.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/sram.S
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>  /*
>>  * Reprograms ULPD and CKCTL.
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap1_sram_reprogram_clock)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0 - r12, lr}             @ save registers on stack
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
>> index 1c1b0ab..39580e6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ extern void omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend(void);
>>  extern void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl,
>>                                        void __iomem *sdrc_power);
>>  extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(u32 *addr, int save_state);
>> -extern void save_secure_ram_context(u32 *addr);
>> +extern int save_secure_ram_context(u32 *addr);
>>  extern void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void);
>>
>>  extern unsigned int omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
>> index c7780cc..b5071a4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
>>  * Note: This code get's copied to internal SRAM at boot. When the OMAP
>>  *      wakes up it continues execution at the point it went to sleep.
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0, lr}           @ save registers on stack
>>        mov     r0, #0                  @ clear for mcr setup
>> @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ ENTRY(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz)
>>  * The DLL load value is not kept in RETENTION or OFF. It needs to be restored
>>  * at wake
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap24xx_cpu_suspend)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0 - r12, lr}     @ save registers on stack
>>        mov     r3, #0x0                @ clear for mcr call
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
>> index 98d8232..951a0be 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
>> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ ENTRY(enable_omap3630_toggle_l2_on_restore)
>>
>>        .text
>>  /* Function to call rom code to save secure ram context */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(save_secure_ram_context)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r1-r12, lr}       @ save registers on stack
>>        adr     r3, api_params          @ r3 points to parameters
>> @@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ ENTRY(save_secure_ram_context_sz)
>>  *   depending on the low power mode (non-OFF vs OFF modes),
>>  *   cf. 'Resume path for xxx mode' comments.
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0-r12, lr}       @ save registers on stack
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram242x.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram242x.S
>> index 055310c..ff9b9db 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram242x.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram242x.S
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>
>>        .text
>>
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap242x_sram_ddr_init)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0 - r12, lr}     @ save registers on stack
>>
>> @@ -143,6 +144,7 @@ ENTRY(omap242x_sram_ddr_init_sz)
>>  * r0 = [PRCM_FULL | PRCM_HALF] r1 = SDRC_DLLA_CTRL value r2 = [DDR | SDR]
>>  * PRCM_FULL = 2, PRCM_HALF = 1, DDR = 1, SDR = 0
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap242x_sram_reprogram_sdrc)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0 - r10, lr}     @ save registers on stack
>>        mov     r3, #0x0                @ clear for mrc call
>> @@ -238,6 +240,7 @@ ENTRY(omap242x_sram_reprogram_sdrc_sz)
>>  /*
>>  * Set dividers and pll. Also recalculate DLL value for DDR and unlock mode.
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap242x_sram_set_prcm)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0-r12, lr}       @ regs to stack
>>        adr     r4, pbegin              @ addr of preload start
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram243x.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram243x.S
>> index f900758..7673020 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram243x.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram243x.S
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>
>>        .text
>>
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap243x_sram_ddr_init)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0 - r12, lr}     @ save registers on stack
>>
>> @@ -143,6 +144,7 @@ ENTRY(omap243x_sram_ddr_init_sz)
>>  * r0 = [PRCM_FULL | PRCM_HALF] r1 = SDRC_DLLA_CTRL value r2 = [DDR | SDR]
>>  * PRCM_FULL = 2, PRCM_HALF = 1, DDR = 1, SDR = 0
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap243x_sram_reprogram_sdrc)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0 - r10, lr}     @ save registers on stack
>>        mov     r3, #0x0                @ clear for mrc call
>> @@ -238,6 +240,7 @@ ENTRY(omap243x_sram_reprogram_sdrc_sz)
>>  /*
>>  * Set dividers and pll. Also recalculate DLL value for DDR and unlock mode.
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap243x_sram_set_prcm)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r0-r12, lr}       @ regs to stack
>>        adr     r4, pbegin              @ addr of preload start
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S
>> index 7f893a2..25011ca 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S
>> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@
>>  * since it will cause the ARM MMU to attempt to walk the page tables.
>>  * These crashes may be intermittent.
>>  */
>> +       .align  3
>>  ENTRY(omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll)
>>        stmfd   sp!, {r1-r12, lr}       @ store regs to stack
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
>> index 9967d5e..d673f2c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
>> @@ -12,7 +12,19 @@
>>  #define __ARCH_ARM_OMAP_SRAM_H
>>
>>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> -extern void * omap_sram_push(void * start, unsigned long size);
>> +#include <asm/fncpy.h>
>> +
>> +extern void *omap_sram_push_address(unsigned long size);
>> +
>> +/* Macro to push a function to the internal SRAM, using the fncpy API */
>> +#define omap_sram_push(funcp, size) ({                         \
>> +       typeof(&funcp) _res = NULL;                             \
>
> 1) For fncpy() itself, I decided not to take the address of funcp
> inside the macro: the reason for this was that if you do this, the
> macro will silently do something silly if called with a function
> pointer instead of the function itself -- i.e., some memory starting
> at the stored function pointer itself will be copied instead of the
> function body.
>
> Forcing the caller to supply the '&' is a bit ugly, but I decided it
> was preferable from a safety standpoint.
>
> This doesn't necessarily mean that omap_sram_push can't add the '&',
> but if you do, you need to be careful how the macro is called.  It
> will work for all existing uses of omap_sram_push, IIUC.
I am OK with that.
In the first place it was not obvious that the '&' was needed but the
compiler quickly reminded me about it. The type checking is one of the
advantages of the new API.

>
> 2) Should this be &(funcp)?  This will only matter for pretty weird
> uses though.  Currently most weird uses won't work properly anyway,
> because of (1).  So this might not be much of a concern.
>
>> +       void *_sram_address = omap_sram_push_address(size);     \
>> +       if (_sram_address)                                      \
>> +               _res = fncpy(_sram_address, &funcp, size);      \
>
> &(funcp)
Yes that is correct but the current code does not have problem since
the functions to push have 'non-weird' types.
If needed I can change that.

>
> (see (2))
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
>

Thanks,
Jean



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list