[RFC 1/2] AT91: Support SAM9260 and SAM9G20-based boards in the same kernel image

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Mon Jan 17 02:57:38 EST 2011


On 18:50 Sat 15 Jan     , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> Nothing actually prevents support for boards based on these SoCs to be
> compiled in the same kernel image, since the SAM9260 and SAM9G20 are
> almost identical (AT91SAM9G20 adds some new features, but is otherwise
> compatible with the AT91SAM9260).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre at free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig |   31 +++++++++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index c015b68..d1eda58 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ config ARCH_AT91RM9200
>  	select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>  	select HAVE_AT91_USART3
>  
> -config ARCH_AT91SAM9260
> -	bool "AT91SAM9260 or AT91SAM9XE"
> +config ARCH_AT91SAM9260_VARIANTS
sos so

I'm working on a similar patch but ARCH_AT91SAM9260_VARIANTS seems so so

I get in mind to get rid of ARCH_AT91SAM92G20

and detect it

Best Regards,
J.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list