[RFC 1/2] AT91: Support SAM9260 and SAM9G20-based boards in the same kernel image
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Mon Jan 17 02:57:38 EST 2011
On 18:50 Sat 15 Jan , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> Nothing actually prevents support for boards based on these SoCs to be
> compiled in the same kernel image, since the SAM9260 and SAM9G20 are
> almost identical (AT91SAM9G20 adds some new features, but is otherwise
> compatible with the AT91SAM9260).
>
> Signed-off-by: Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index c015b68..d1eda58 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ config ARCH_AT91RM9200
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select HAVE_AT91_USART3
>
> -config ARCH_AT91SAM9260
> - bool "AT91SAM9260 or AT91SAM9XE"
> +config ARCH_AT91SAM9260_VARIANTS
sos so
I'm working on a similar patch but ARCH_AT91SAM9260_VARIANTS seems so so
I get in mind to get rid of ARCH_AT91SAM92G20
and detect it
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list