[PATCH 2/2] ARM i.MXS: Add auart platform support for i.MX28
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at freescale.com
Wed Jan 12 00:06:44 EST 2011
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:17:25PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:09:05PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c | 5 ++
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices-mx28.h | 8 +++
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig | 3 +
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-auart.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/devices-common.h | 10 ++++
> > 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-auart.c
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> > index 74e2103..9f65934 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> > @@ -603,6 +603,11 @@ _DEFINE_CLOCK(fec_clk, ENET, DISABLE, &hbus_clk);
> >
> > static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
> > _REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-duart.0", NULL, uart_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-auart.0", NULL, uart_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-auart.1", NULL, uart_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-auart.2", NULL, uart_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-auart.3", NULL, uart_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-auart.4", NULL, uart_clk)
> > _REGISTER_CLOCK("fec.0", NULL, fec_clk)
> > _REGISTER_CLOCK("rtc", NULL, rtc_clk)
> > _REGISTER_CLOCK("pll2", NULL, pll2_clk)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices-mx28.h b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices-mx28.h
> > index 00b736c..a0b70df 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices-mx28.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices-mx28.h
> > @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ extern const struct mxs_duart_data mx28_duart_data __initconst;
> > #define mx28_add_duart() \
> > mxs_add_duart(&mx28_duart_data)
> >
> > +extern const struct mxs_auart_data mx28_auart_data[] __initconst;
> > +#define mx28_add_auart(id) mxs_add_auart(&mx28_auart_data[id])
> > +#define mx28_add_auart0() mx28_add_auart(0)
> > +#define mx28_add_auart1() mx28_add_auart(1)
> > +#define mx28_add_auart2() mx28_add_auart(2)
> > +#define mx28_add_auart3() mx28_add_auart(3)
> > +#define mx28_add_auart4() mx28_add_auart(4)
> I wouldn't add the mx28_add_auartX macros, only mx28_add_auart. The
> former are a relict of the time when we didn't use an array to get the
> data from.
>
> > +
> > extern const struct mxs_fec_data mx28_fec_data[] __initconst;
> > #define mx28_add_fec(id, pdata) \
> > mxs_add_fec(&mx28_fec_data[id], pdata)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig
> > index a35a2dc..9d16540 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
> > config MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_DUART
> > bool
> >
> > +config MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_AUART
> > + bool
> > +
> This doesn't happen to be an amba device, too?
>
> > config MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_FEC
> > bool
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Makefile
> > index 4b5266a..b46d18d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Makefile
> > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_DUART) += platform-duart.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_AUART) += platform-auart.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_FEC) += platform-fec.o
> this conflicts with the "make duart use amba-pl011 driver" patch.
May I know the reason that the patch is still pending for being
merged? DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP warning?
[...]
--
Regards,
Shawn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list