[PATCH 2/3] ARM i.MX53 enable spi on EVK board
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Tue Jan 11 05:43:28 EST 2011
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:15:49AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd prefer to have the following subject:
>
> ARM: mx5/mx53_evk: add spi device
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:08:53PM +0800, yong.shen at freescale.com wrote:
> > From: Yong Shen <yong.shen at freescale.com>
> >
> > 1. some macro definitions fix
> > 2. add platform data for spi device
> > 3. register spi clocks
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Shen <yong.shen at freescale.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 3 +++
> > arch/arm/mach-mx5/devices-imx53.h | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-spi_imx.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx53.h | 10 +++++-----
> > 6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig
> > index 23b0e3f..777740b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig
> > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ config MACH_MX53_EVK
> > select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_IMX_UART
> > select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_IMX_I2C
> > select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
> > + select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_SPI_IMX
> > help
> > Include support for MX53 EVK platform. This includes specific
> > configurations for the board and its peripherals.
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c
> > index 4043451..8017d68 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> > #include <mach/iomux-mx53.h>
> >
> > #define SMD_FEC_PHY_RST IMX_GPIO_NR(7, 6)
> > +#define EVK_ECSPI1_CS0 IMX_GPIO_NR(3, 19)
> > +#define EVK_ECSPI1_CS1 IMX_GPIO_NR(2, 30)
> >
> > #include "crm_regs.h"
> > #include "devices-imx53.h"
> > @@ -89,6 +91,16 @@ static struct fec_platform_data mx53_evk_fec_pdata = {
> > .phy = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII,
> > };
> >
> > +static int mx53_evk_spi_cs[] = {
> > + EVK_ECSPI1_CS0,
> > + EVK_ECSPI1_CS1,
> don't you need to setup some pinmuxing to make this work?
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct spi_imx_master mx53_evk_spi_data __initconst = {
> > + .chipselect = mx53_evk_spi_cs,
> > + .num_chipselect = ARRAY_SIZE(mx53_evk_spi_cs),
> > +};
> > +
> > static void __init mx53_evk_board_init(void)
> > {
> > mxc_iomux_v3_setup_multiple_pads(mx53_evk_pads,
> > @@ -102,6 +114,8 @@ static void __init mx53_evk_board_init(void)
> >
> > imx53_add_sdhci_esdhc_imx(0, NULL);
> > imx53_add_sdhci_esdhc_imx(1, NULL);
> > +
> > + imx53_add_ecspi(0, &mx53_evk_spi_data);
> > }
> >
> > static void __init mx53_evk_timer_init(void)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> > index d0f58a3..a20d0c0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> > @@ -1330,6 +1330,9 @@ static struct clk_lookup mx53_lookups[] = {
> > _REGISTER_CLOCK("imx-i2c.1", NULL, i2c2_clk)
> > _REGISTER_CLOCK("sdhci-esdhc-imx.0", NULL, esdhc1_clk)
> > _REGISTER_CLOCK("sdhci-esdhc-imx.1", NULL, esdhc2_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("imx53-ecspi.0", NULL, ecspi1_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("imx53-ecspi.1", NULL, ecspi2_clk)
> > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("imx53-cspi.0", NULL, cspi_clk)
> maybe this should better go into a seperate patch? (i.e.
>
> ARM: mx53: add support to dynamically register imx-spi devices
Yes. We should not add mix architecture support and board support in a
single patch.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list