[PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Mon Jan 10 17:41:34 EST 2011


On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:45:14AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> 
> > wrote:
> > >>>  Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile              |    8 +
> > >>>  Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c                |  169 
> > >>+++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm")
> > >>instead of "Documentation"?
> > >>Just a thought... ;-)
> > >
> > >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet.
> > >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it.
> > 
> > I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space 
> > tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were 
> > moved to "tools/perf".
> > 
> > Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or 
> > "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-)
> > 
> I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long
> way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others
> have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit
> of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic. 

I would prefer to leave the code in Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/ as
it complements the document that is in the same directory - weather
its more code or documentation is debatable IMHO.

I'm happy to move things later if a consensus is reached.




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list