[PATCH 1/4] arm: omap: gpio: don't access irq_desc array directly
Kevin Hilman
khilman at ti.com
Wed Jan 5 12:11:34 EST 2011
Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:24:58PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> writes:
>>
>> > Instead of accessing the irq_desc array directly
>> > we can use irq_to_desc(irq). That will allow us to,
>> > if wanted, select SPARSE_IRQ and irq_descs will be
>> > added to a radix tree, instead of a array.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
>>
>> Can you refresh this one against Tony's omap-for-linus branch. The GPIO
>> omap_device/hwmod conversion changed things around a bit and this patch
>> doesn't apply.
>>
>> After that, you can send separately, and I'll queue this one along with
>> some other GPIO core fixes for the 2.6.38-rc series after -rc1 comes
>> out.
>
> Sure, it's attached to this mail.
Thanks. Queueing for 2.6.38-rc
Kevin
>
> From 8d216ccac14e4eebf259d5b40ed2d239248710e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:46:18 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: omap: gpio: don't access irq_desc array directly
> Organization: Texas Instruments\n
>
> Instead of accessing the irq_desc array directly
> we can use irq_to_desc(irq). That will allow us to,
> if wanted, select SPARSE_IRQ and irq_descs will be
> added to a radix tree, instead of a array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> index 1f98e0b..197a6c0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> @@ -756,8 +756,10 @@ static int gpio_irq_type(unsigned irq, unsigned type)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> retval = _set_gpio_triggering(bank, get_gpio_index(gpio), type);
> if (retval == 0) {
> - irq_desc[irq].status &= ~IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> - irq_desc[irq].status |= type;
> + struct irq_desc *d = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + d->status &= ~IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> + d->status |= type;
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>
> @@ -1671,7 +1673,9 @@ static void __init omap_gpio_chip_init(struct gpio_bank *bank)
>
> for (j = bank->virtual_irq_start;
> j < bank->virtual_irq_start + bank_width; j++) {
> - lockdep_set_class(&irq_desc[j].lock, &gpio_lock_class);
> + struct irq_desc *d = irq_to_desc(j);
> +
> + lockdep_set_class(&d->lock, &gpio_lock_class);
> set_irq_chip_data(j, bank);
> if (bank_is_mpuio(bank))
> set_irq_chip(j, &mpuio_irq_chip);
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list