[PATCH 2/4] arm: Kconfig: remove duplicated GENERIC_HARDIRQS entry
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Tue Jan 4 15:54:45 EST 2011
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:33:01PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:00:31PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:02:55PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > @@ -171,9 +168,6 @@ config FIQ
> > > config ARCH_MTD_XIP
> > > bool
> > >
> > > -config GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
> > > - def_bool y
> > > -
> > You didn't mention this change in the commit log. Is this duplicated,
> > too or did it just slip through?
> If you look at kernel/irq/Kconfig (as I did with the original patch)
> you'd notice kernel/irq/Kconfig defines both of these symbols being
> removed when HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS is enabled.
> If you read the discussion in the previous version of this patch set,
> you'd notice that the removal of this was specifically requested.
> It's very tiresome to have to re-explain these things. Please take
> some more time to research the points you bring up, rather than
I don't agree here 100%. IMHO the commit log was not good enough for
the change introduced by the patch (and Felipe's reply suggests that he
agrees). I could still research it, but:
- it was not obvious for me there was a previous version (no "v2" or
similar in the patch subject);
- for me it would take say 5 minutes to check, the author knows
the answer to my question immediately (at least he should);
- after a research I could suggest a better wording, but I don't care
much if it's me or Felipe who comes up with a better text.
So all in all I'm still confident that my mail was OK.
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel