[PATCH] usb: ehci: make HC see up-to-date qh/qtd descriptor ASAP
Mark Salter
msalter at redhat.com
Tue Aug 30 14:45:34 EDT 2011
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 13:15 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Mark Salter wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 00:03 +0800, ming.lei at canonical.com wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * Writing to dma coherent memory on ARM may be delayed via L2
> > > + * writing buffer, so introduce the helper which can flush L2 writing
> > > + * buffer into memory immediately, especially used to flush ehci
> > > + * descriptor to memory.
> > > + * */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
> > > +static inline void ehci_sync_mem()
> > > +{
> > > + mb();
> > > +}
> > > +#else
> > > +static inline void ehci_sync_mem()
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> >
> > I'm wondering if this doesn't really belong in the DMA API for any
> > future architectures that can't avoid prolonged write buffering to DMA
> > coherent memory. IIUC, ARM mitigates this for most drivers by including
> > an implicit write buffer flush in the mmio write routines. This takes
> > care of the drivers which write to a mmio device register after writing
> > something to shared DMA memory. IIUC, this doesn't help ehci because the
> > host controller is polling to see what the cpu writes to the shared
> > memory. Other hardware which polls shared memory like that will likely
> > have the same problem and could use buffer drain helpers as well.
>
> This would be a good thing to define centrally. Would you like to
> post an RFC on LKML?
Yes, I can take a stab at that.
>
> Do you know of any other examples of hardware that polls shared DMA
> memory?
Not offhand nor after a quick search. I don't think it is a common
way of doing things.
--Mark
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list