[RFC PATCH 1/1] ASoC: soc-core: symmetry checking for each DAIs separately
Dong Aisheng-B29396
B29396 at freescale.com
Fri Aug 26 05:39:09 EDT 2011
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
> kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Dong Aisheng
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 5:36 PM
> To: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> Cc: lars at metafoo.de; s.hauer at pengutronix.de;
> broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; w.sang at pengutronix.de; lrg at ti.com;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] ASoC: soc-core: symmetry checking for each DAIs
> separately
>
> The orginal code does not cover the case that one DAI such as codec may
> be shared between other two DAIs(CPU).
> When do symmetry checking, altough the codec DAI requires symmetry, the
> two CPU DAIs may still be configured to run on different rates.
>
> We change to check each DAI's state separately instead of only checking
> the dai link to prevent this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396 at freescale.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg at ti.com>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <w.sang at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars at metafoo.de>
>
> ---
> include/sound/soc-dai.h | 3 ++
> include/sound/soc.h | 2 -
> sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> -----
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dai.h b/include/sound/soc-dai.h index
> 5ad5f3a..844d4ed 100644
> --- a/include/sound/soc-dai.h
> +++ b/include/sound/soc-dai.h
> @@ -242,6 +242,9 @@ struct snd_soc_dai {
> void *playback_dma_data;
> void *capture_dma_data;
>
> + /* Symmetry data */
> + unsigned int rate;
> +
> /* parent platform/codec */
> union {
> struct snd_soc_platform *platform;
> diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h index
> 3fe658e..5449139 100644
> --- a/include/sound/soc.h
> +++ b/include/sound/soc.h
> @@ -849,8 +849,6 @@ struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime {
> unsigned int complete:1;
> unsigned int dev_registered:1;
>
> - /* Symmetry data - only valid if symmetry is being enforced */
> - unsigned int rate;
> long pmdown_time;
>
> /* runtime devices */
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index
> 1aee9fc..3f7ded7 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> @@ -32,33 +32,54 @@ static int soc_pcm_apply_symmetry(struct
> snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data;
> struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = rtd->cpu_dai;
> struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai = rtd->codec_dai;
> + unsigned int race;
> + unsigned int force_rate;
> int ret;
>
> + race = 0;
> + force_rate = 0;
> +
> if (!codec_dai->driver->symmetric_rates &&
> !cpu_dai->driver->symmetric_rates &&
> !rtd->dai_link->symmetric_rates)
> return 0;
>
> + if (codec_dai->active && codec_dai->driver->symmetric_rates ||
> + codec_dai->active && rtd->dai_link->symmetric_rates) {
> + if (codec_dai->rate != 0)
> + force_rate = codec_dai->rate;
> + else
> + race = 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_dai->active && cpu_dai->driver->symmetric_rates ||
> + codec_dai->active && rtd->dai_link->symmetric_rates) {
> + if (cpu_dai->rate != 0)
> + force_rate = cpu_dai->rate;
> + else
> + race = 1;
> + }
One concern is that I'm not sure about the original purpose of
dai_link->symmetric_rates, from the code visually, i guess that if the
dai link requires symmetry, the pcm open will force symmetry unconditionly
no matter whether CPU DAIs or Codec DAIs have symmetry constraints.
So i just follow that idea in this patch.
But it seems it may bring a little complex since we already have DAIs
Symmetry checking.
So i wonder can we remove the symmetric_rates for dai link?
Then we may just check DAIs symmetry to decide whether we should do
force symmetry.
> + if (force_rate) {
> + dev_dbg(&rtd->dev, "Symmetry forces %dHz rate\n", rtd->rate);
> +
> + ret = snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax(substream->runtime,
> + SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE,
> + force_rate, force_rate);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&rtd->dev,
> + "Unable to apply rate symmetry constraint: %d\n",
> ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* This can happen if multiple streams are starting simultaneously
> -
> * the second can need to get its constraints before the first has
> * picked a rate. Complain and allow the application to carry on.
> */
> - if (!rtd->rate) {
> + if (race)
> dev_warn(&rtd->dev,
> - "Not enforcing symmetric_rates due to race\n");
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - dev_dbg(&rtd->dev, "Symmetry forces %dHz rate\n", rtd->rate);
> -
> - ret = snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax(substream->runtime,
> - SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE,
> - rtd->rate, rtd->rate);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(&rtd->dev,
> - "Unable to apply rate symmetry constraint: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + "Not enforcing symmetric_rates due to race\n");
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -287,9 +308,14 @@ static int soc_pcm_close(struct snd_pcm_substream
> *substream)
> cpu_dai->active--;
> codec_dai->active--;
> codec->active--;
> + rtd->active--;
> +
> + /* clear the corresponding DAIs rate when inactive */
> + if (!cpu_dai->active)
> + cpu_dai->rate = 0;
>
> - if (!cpu_dai->active && !codec_dai->active)
> - rtd->rate = 0;
> + if (!codec_dai->active)
> + codec_dai->rate = 0;
>
> /* Muting the DAC suppresses artifacts caused during digital
> * shutdown, for example from stopping clocks.
> @@ -447,7 +473,9 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream
> *substream,
> }
> }
>
> - rtd->rate = params_rate(params);
> + /* store the rate for each DAIs */
> + cpu_dai->rate = params_rate(params);
> + codec_dai->rate = params_rate(params);
>
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&rtd->pcm_mutex);
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list