[PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: CSR: add PM sleep entry for SiRFprimaII
Barry Song
21cnbao at gmail.com
Thu Aug 25 04:21:56 EDT 2011
2011/8/25 Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at freescale.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:30:27PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>> 2011/8/25 Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at freescale.com>:
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:15:50PM -0700, Barry Song wrote:
>> >> From: Rongjun Ying <rongjun.ying at csr.com>
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Rongjun Ying <rongjun.ying at csr.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song at csr.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> -v2:
>> >> delete redundant ARM mode registers save/restore
>> >> use generic cpu suspend
>> >> move l2 cache suspend/resume codes out
>> >> make memc become a device driver
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.h | 31 ++++++++
>> >> arch/arm/mach-prima2/sleep.S | 61 ++++++++++++++++
>> >> 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.c
>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.h
>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-prima2/sleep.S
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..75167df
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.c
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * power management entry for CSR SiRFprimaII
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Copyright (c) 2011 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Licensed under GPLv2 or later.
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/rtc/sirfsoc_rtciobrg.h>
>> >> +#include <asm/suspend.h>
>> >> +
>> >> +#include "pm.h"
>> >> +
>> >> +static u32 sirfsoc_pwrc_base;
>> >> +void __iomem *sirfsoc_memc_base;
>> >> +
>> >> +static void sirfsoc_set_wakeup_source(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + u32 pwr_trigger_en_reg;
>> >> + pwr_trigger_en_reg = sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_readl(sirfsoc_pwrc_base +
>> >> + SIRFSOC_PWRC_TRIGGER_EN);
>> >> +#define X_ON_KEY_B (1 << 0)
>> >> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_writel(pwr_trigger_en_reg | X_ON_KEY_B,
>> >> + sirfsoc_pwrc_base + SIRFSOC_PWRC_TRIGGER_EN);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void sirfsoc_set_sleep_mode(u32 mode)
>> >> +{
>> >> + u32 sleep_mode = sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_readl(sirfsoc_pwrc_base +
>> >> + SIRFSOC_PWRC_PDN_CTRL);
>> >> + sleep_mode &= ~(SIRFSOC_SLEEP_MODE_MASK << 1);
>> >> + sleep_mode |= ((mode << 1));
>> >
>> > Redundant parentheses.
>> >
>> >> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_writel(sleep_mode, sirfsoc_pwrc_base +
>> >> + SIRFSOC_PWRC_PDN_CTRL);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +int sirfsoc_pre_suspend_power_off(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + u32 wakeup_entry = virt_to_phys(cpu_resume);
>> >> +
>> >> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_writel(wakeup_entry,
>> >> + SIRFSOC_PWRC_SCRATCH_PAD1);
>> >> +
>> >> + sirfsoc_set_wakeup_source();
>> >> +
>> >> + sirfsoc_set_sleep_mode(SIRFSOC_DEEP_SLEEP_MODE);
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> > If I read it correctly, this function sets up resume entry, but I
>> > failed to see it being called anywhere? Am I missing anything?
>>
>> lose this while sending patch, it is before cpu_suspend() called.
>> Thanks for review.
>>
>> >
>> >> +static void sirfsoc_save_register(u32 *ptr)
>> >> +{
>> >> + /* todo: save necessary system registers here */
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void sirfsoc_restore_regs(u32 *ptr)
>> >> +{
>> >> + /* todo: restore saved system registers here */
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int sirfsoc_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>> >> +{
>> >> + u32 *saved_regs;
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (state) {
>> >> + case PM_SUSPEND_MEM:
>> >> + saved_regs = kmalloc(1024, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> >> + if (!saved_regs)
>> >> + return -ENOMEM;
>> >> +
>> >> + sirfsoc_save_register(saved_regs);
>> >> +
>> >> + /* go zzz */
>> >> + cpu_suspend(0, sirfsoc_finish_suspend);
>> >> +
>> >> + sirfsoc_restore_regs(saved_regs);
>> >> + kfree(saved_regs);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> + }
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static const struct platform_suspend_ops sirfsoc_pm_ops = {
>> >> + .enter = sirfsoc_pm_enter,
>> >> + .valid = suspend_valid_only_mem,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static int __init sirfsoc_pm_init(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + suspend_set_ops(&sirfsoc_pm_ops);
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +late_initcall(sirfsoc_pm_init);
>> >> +
>> >
>> > 8<---
>> >> +static struct of_device_id pwrc_ids[] = {
>> >> + { .compatible = "sirf,prima2-pwrc" },
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static int __init sirfsoc_of_pwrc_init(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct device_node *np;
>> >> + const __be32 *addrp;
>> >> +
>> >> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, pwrc_ids);
>> >> + if (!np)
>> >> + panic("unable to find compatible pwrc node in dtb\n");
>> >> +
>> >> + addrp = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL);
>> >> + if (!addrp)
>> >> + panic("unable to find base address of pwrc node in dtb\n");
>> >> +
>> >> + sirfsoc_pwrc_base = be32_to_cpup(addrp);
>> >> +
>> >> + of_node_put(np);
>> > --->8
>> >
>> > To me, it seems that the above code snippet can be as simply as the
>> > following.
>> >
>> > np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "sirf,prima2-pwrc");
>> > sirfsoc_pwrc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> > if (!sirfsoc_pwrc_base)
>> > return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> you might want to read earlier thread in v1. PWRC is not in memory space.
>>
> Ah, just read. Then you at least should be able to use
> of_property_read_u32().
>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +postcore_initcall(sirfsoc_of_pwrc_init);
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct of_device_id memc_ids[] = {
>> >> + { .compatible = "sirf,prima2-memc" },
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static int __devinit sirfsoc_memc_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct device_node *np = op->dev.of_node;
>> >> +
>> >> + sirfsoc_memc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> >> + if (!sirfsoc_memc_base)
>> >> + panic("unable to map memc registers\n");
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct platform_driver sirfsoc_memc_driver = {
>> >> + .probe = sirfsoc_memc_probe,
>> >> + .driver = {
>> >> + .name = "sirfsoc-memc",
>> >> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> >> + .of_match_table = memc_ids,
>> >> + },
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static int __init sirfsoc_memc_init(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return platform_driver_register(&sirfsoc_memc_driver);
>> >> +}
>> >> +postcore_initcall(sirfsoc_memc_init);
>> >
>> > Doing the same thing - mapping address, why sirfsoc_pwrc_base uses
>> > a function, while sirfsoc_memc_base needs a platform_driver? You
>> > will have more stuff about memc to add there?
>>
>> memc is in memory space, actually simple_bus, then a platform device
>> has existed for it.
>> pwrc is now not compitable with simple_bus. it looks like not worth a
>> platform for the moment too.
>>
> It seems a little complicated to register a platform_driver just for
> getting an address. I'm not sure how hard Arnd is on this position.
> I'm going to send a patch to test it :)
i think Arnd preferred it to be driver:
"
> +static void __init sirfsoc_of_memc_map(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, memc_ids);
> + if (!np)
> + panic("unable to find compatible memc node in dtb\n");
> +
> + sirfsoc_memc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + if (!np)
> + panic("unable to map compatible memc node in dtb\n");
> +
> + of_node_put(np);
> +}
Same as for the other one, I think this should be another device
driver.
"
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shawn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list