[PATCH v5 12/22] gpio/omap: cleanup set_gpio_triggering function
Santosh
santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Tue Aug 23 09:21:27 EDT 2011
On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> Getting rid of ifdefs within the function by adding register offset intctrl
> and associating OMAPXXXX_GPIO_INT_CONTROL in respective SoC specific files.
> Also, use wkup_status register consistently instead of referring to wakeup
> clear and wakeup set register offsets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma<tarun.kanti at ti.com>
> ---
Good. Some comments.
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c | 3 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 159 ++++++++-----------------------
> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c
> index f8c15ea..2adfece 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static struct omap_gpio_reg_offs omap15xx_mpuio_regs = {
> .irqstatus = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_INT,
> .irqenable = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_MASKIT,
> .irqenable_inv = true,
> + .irqctrl = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_INT_EDGE,
> };
>
> static struct __initdata omap_gpio_platform_data omap15xx_mpu_gpio_config = {
> @@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ static struct omap_gpio_reg_offs omap15xx_gpio_regs = {
> .irqstatus = OMAP1510_GPIO_INT_STATUS,
> .irqenable = OMAP1510_GPIO_INT_MASK,
> .irqenable_inv = true,
> + .irqctrl = OMAP1510_GPIO_INT_CONTROL,
> };
>
> static struct __initdata omap_gpio_platform_data omap15xx_gpio_config = {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c
> index ed9f285..f619805 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static struct omap_gpio_reg_offs omap16xx_mpuio_regs = {
> .irqstatus = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_INT,
> .irqenable = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_MASKIT,
> .irqenable_inv = true,
> + .irqctrl = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_INT_EDGE,
> };
>
> static struct __initdata omap_gpio_platform_data omap16xx_mpu_gpio_config = {
> @@ -90,6 +91,8 @@ static struct omap_gpio_reg_offs omap16xx_gpio_regs = {
> .set_irqenable = OMAP1610_GPIO_SET_IRQENABLE1,
> .clr_irqenable = OMAP1610_GPIO_CLEAR_IRQENABLE1,
> .wkup_status = OMAP1610_GPIO_WAKEUPENABLE,
> + .edgectrl1 = OMAP1610_GPIO_EDGE_CTRL1,
> + .edgectrl2 = OMAP1610_GPIO_EDGE_CTRL2,
> };
>
> static struct __initdata omap_gpio_platform_data omap16xx_gpio1_config = {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c
> index 923eaa1..cb083c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static struct omap_gpio_reg_offs omap7xx_mpuio_regs = {
> .irqstatus = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_INT / 2,
> .irqenable = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_MASKIT / 2,
> .irqenable_inv = true,
> + .irqctrl = OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_INT_EDGE / 2,
Shift operator would have been better here.
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index e7c9fe5..21cb0d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
[..]
> + trigger != 0);
> +
> + /* This part needs to be executed always for OMAP34xx */
> + if (cpu_is_omap34xx() || (bank->non_wakeup_gpios& gpio_bit)) {
Why ? You might want handle this special case with some flag instead.
> /*
> * Log the edge gpio and manually trigger the IRQ
> * after resume if the input level changes
> @@ -261,7 +236,6 @@ static inline void set_24xx_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio,
> __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->leveldetect0) |
> __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->leveldetect1);
> }
> -#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1
> /*
[...]
> -#endif
> - default:
> - goto bad;
> +
> + _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_status, 1<< gpio, trigger);
> +
Avoid this extra line.
Rest of the changes looks good to me.
Regards
Santosh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list