[PATCH 3/3] ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
Dave Martin
dave.martin at linaro.org
Tue Aug 16 12:05:38 EDT 2011
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Tixy wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>> [...]
>> > +#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE
>> > + .align 2
>> > +.LCcpu_architecture:
>> > + .word __cpu_architecture
>> > +#endif
>>
>> What's the convention about the prefix '.LC' as opposed to just '.L'?
>
> The .Lfoo format is more widely used than .LCfoo in the tree.
...but .LCfoo is more widely used in entry-armv.S, for exactly the
same kind of thing.
I thought it best to blend in... anyway, apart from the magic prefix
'.L', it's just a name.
Any concerns about this, or can we leave it as-is?
Cheers
---Dave
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list