[PATCH] ARM: Add safe diagnostic to indicate when __cpu_architecture isn't set up
Tixy
tixy at yxit.co.uk
Tue Aug 16 10:45:21 EDT 2011
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:19 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
> This patch is useful for debugging, but I'm not convinced it should
> be merged.
[...]
> static inline int __pure cpu_architecture(void)
> {
> - BUG_ON(__cpu_architecture == CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN);
> - return __cpu_architecture;
> + if (unlikely(__cpu_architecture == CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN)) {
> + extern int __pure __get_cpu_architecture(void);
> +
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "__cpu_architecture not set yet!\n");
> + return __get_cpu_architecture();
> + } else
> + return __cpu_architecture;
> }
Seems to me that if we go down this route, cpu_architecture() may as
well remain a non-inline function which just calculates the arch if it's
not already set...
if (unlikely(__cpu_architecture == CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN))
__cpu_architecture = __get_cpu_architecture();
return __cpu_architecture;
There seems to be too many ways to skin this cat :-)
--
Tixy
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list