[PATCH 0/4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Support generic Power domain framework for EXYNOS4210

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, August 11, 2011, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> The following patch set use the generic Power domain Framework instead of
> power domain code depend of Samsung SoC.
> 
> Chanwoo Choi (4):
>   ARM: EXYNOS4: Support for generic I/O power domains on EXYNOS4210
>   ARM: EXYNOS4: Support for generic Clock manipulation PM callbacks
>   ARM: EXYNOS4: Delete the power-domain code depend on Samsung SoC
>   ARM: EXYNOS4: Add power domain to use generic Power domain Framework
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig                      |   10 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile                     |    4 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dev-pd.c                     |  139 --------------
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h |   52 ++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/regs-clock.h    |    8 +
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-nuri.c                  |   21 ++-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkc210.c              |   26 ++-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c              |   23 ++-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c        |   21 ++-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-exynos4210.c              |  189 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-runtime.c                 |   56 ++++++
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig                      |    8 -
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile                     |    4 -
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/pd.h            |   30 ---
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/pd.c                         |   95 ----------
>  15 files changed, 377 insertions(+), 309 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dev-pd.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-exynos4210.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-runtime.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/pd.h
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/pd.c

The patchset looks good to me, but please note that some code it
is based on will most likely change in 3.2 due to this patchset:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/8/420

Thanks,
Rafael