[PATCH v4] ARM: ep93xx: use more reliable CPLD watchdog for reset on ts72xx
H Hartley Sweeten
hartleys at visionengravers.com
Wed Aug 10 13:45:36 EDT 2011
On Friday, June 03, 2011 11:28 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> On all ep93xx based boards from Technologic Systems, there's CPLD watchdog
> available, so use this one to reset the board instead of the soft reset in
> CPU. I've seen some weird lockups with the soft reset on ep93xx in the past,
> while the reset via CPLD watchdog seems to be rock solid (tm) and works fine
> so far.
>
> Cc: Ryan Mallon <ryan at bluewatersys.com>
> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz at true.cz>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/system.h | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/system.h b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/system.h
> index 6d661fe..67ec430 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/system.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/system.h
> @@ -2,7 +2,10 @@
> * arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/system.h
> */
>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +
> #include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <mach/ts72xx.h>
>
> static inline void arch_idle(void)
> {
> @@ -13,11 +16,16 @@ static inline void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
> {
> local_irq_disable();
>
> - /*
> - * Set then clear the SWRST bit to initiate a software reset
> - */
> - ep93xx_devcfg_set_bits(EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVCFG_SWRST);
> - ep93xx_devcfg_clear_bits(EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVCFG_SWRST);
> + if (board_is_ts7200() || board_is_ts7250() || board_is_ts7260() ||
> + board_is_ts7300() || board_is_ts7400()) {
> + /* We use more reliable CPLD watchdog to perform the reset */
> + __raw_writeb(0x5, TS72XX_WDT_FEED_PHYS_BASE);
> + __raw_writeb(0x1, TS72XX_WDT_CONTROL_PHYS_BASE);
> + } else {
> + /* Set then clear the SWRST bit to initiate a software reset */
> + ep93xx_devcfg_set_bits(EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVCFG_SWRST);
> + ep93xx_devcfg_clear_bits(EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVCFG_SWRST);
> + }
>
> while (1)
> ;
Petr,
This patch is still in Russell's patch tracker. I just realized a possible
problem with it.
If any other ep93xx machine is selected along with MACH_TS72XX and the kernel
is booted on a non-ts72xx machine, the static mapping for the ts72xx CPLD will
not be done. I believe this will cause a problem when doing the boad_is_*
calls due to the:
__raw_readb(TS72XX_MODEL_VIRT_BASE)
I think the best solution is to remove the #include <mach/ts72xx.h> from this
patch and change this:
+ if (board_is_ts7200() || board_is_ts7250() || board_is_ts7260() ||
+ board_is_ts7300() || board_is_ts7400()) {
To:
+ if (machine_is_ts72xx())
This will correctly evaluate is the kernel is booted on a MACH_TYPE_TS72XX
system.
Can you please update and test the patch?
Regards,
Hartley
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list