[PATCH] sa1111: Prevent deadlock in resume path
Marek Vasut
marek.vasut at gmail.com
Wed May 26 18:35:54 EDT 2010
Dne Čt 27. května 2010 00:25:30 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:52:33PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > You don't want the patch? Fine by me ... Anyway, please, open your eyes,
> > look around, noone in the whole community does such complications. Why
> > do you do that? What does it help? Why can't you just pick patches as
> > everyone else does -- from email. That's why git supports it.
>
> What you're saying is that *everyone* has to conform to your way of
> working.
Come on, you know it's not what I said.
> Sorry, the human race isn't like that. Humans are individuals,
> and each one has their own quirks.
Fine by me, there aren't many people I have problems with.
>
> Mine is that I'm dreadful at dealing with patches in email. Unless I
> deal with a message at the point I've read it, it basically doesn't
> exist.
Why don't you set up a mailbox for that ? You read the emails anyway and you can
drop the patches you Ack into that mailbox ... then run git am on that once in a
while.
> So I created the patch system 10 years ago to solve that problem
> - to keep patches around and visible, *and* to make them easier for me
> to merge.
Things changed ever since then ...
>
> So your choice is:
>
> 1. send patches by email, but have to repeatedly send them to get them
> applied.
>
> 2. send the patch to the patch system so that it's easily visible and
> doesn't get buried beneath a mountain of email.
>
> Lastly, I don't do kernel work 7 days a week.
Neither do I, nor am I paid for it. I do it in my free time.
> I do have time off when I
> don't look at the kernel tree, but I still read email. Maybe you'd
> prefer me to ignore all email on those days I'm not working instead?
See above please.
>
> The patch system is there to _solve_ a problem.
And it's there to create another one.
> If you don't want to use it, the fine, don't expect that problem to be solved
> for your patches.
The problem should be solved already. This discussion was here already, it
repeats and people complain.
>
> And now, at this point I really don't have any more time for you and
> these stupid, idiotic and childish politics.
I'm just trying to solve a real problem here.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list