[PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

Pinkava J. wrote:

>>> When saving GPIOs during suspend/resume we need skip missing GPIO banks, not
>>> trying get corresponding chip again and again in infinite loop.
>>     I didn't see any infinite loops there -- *continue* itself leads to 
>> incrementing 'gpio_nr', no?

> No, it would have to be:

> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END; gpio_nr++) {
> ...

> try create simple test program for your self

> /* test.c */
> main()
> {
> 	int x;
> 	for(x = 0; x < 10; /* x++ */ )
> 	{
> 		printf("x  = %d", x);
> 	}
> }

> Compile usign:

> gcc test.c

> Run

 > ./a.out

    Ah, I missed the empty 3rd expression in *for*, sorry. :-<
Strange loop though...

>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava <jiri.pinkava at vscht.cz>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c |    8 ++++++--
>>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>>> index d50ab9d..7df03f8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>>> @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@ void s3c_pm_save_gpios(void)
>>>
>>>  	for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>>>  		ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>>> -		if (!ourchip)
>>> +		if (!ourchip) {
>>> +			gpio_nr++;
>>>  			continue;
>>> +		}
>>>
>>>  		s3c_pm_save_gpio(ourchip);
>>>
>>> @@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ void s3c_pm_restore_gpios(void)
>>>
>>>  	for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>>>  		ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>>> -		if (!ourchip)
>>> +		if (!ourchip) {
>>> +			gpio_nr++;
>>>  			continue;
>>> +		}
>>>
>>>  		s3c_pm_resume_gpio(ourchip);

WBR, Sergei