Boot interface for device trees on ARM
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Wed May 19 07:45:50 EDT 2010
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr at canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we're getting closer to device tree support on ARM, I'd like to get some
> input on our proposed boot interface.
>
> Basically, I'd like to define how we pass the device tree from the bootloader
> to the kernel.
>
> My current method of doing this is through a new atag. It looks like this:
>
> /* flattened device tree blob pointer */
> #define ATAG_DEVTREE 0x5441000a
>
> struct tag_devtree {
> __u32 start; /* physical start address */
> __u32 size; /* size of dtb image in bytes */
> };
>
> With ATAG_DEVTREE, we keep the existing boot interface the same (ie, machine
> number in r1, atags pointer r2).
For the reference of those new to this discussion, here is a link to
the previous thread and the link to the draft boot interface document.
http://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org/msg00884.html
http://devicetree.org/Boot_Environment
[...]
> - We are now potentially carrying data in two different places - atags and
> the device tree. For example, the physical memory layout and kernel command
> line may be present in both.
I've tried to explicitly addresses this in the draft document. the DT
blob always supersedes ATAG information.
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list