[PATCH] ARM: Add support for 10 hardirq bits
magnus.damm at gmail.com
Wed May 19 05:05:53 EDT 2010
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:16:32PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi again Russell,
>> > Will you pick up this one in your tree as-is, or would you like me to
>> > resubmit it somehow?
>> I don't seem to find this patch in your -devel branch. I posted a same
>> version of patch earlier, so I'd also like to see this get merged.
>> Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao at gmail.com>
>> I guess you may please help submit this to rmk's patch tracking system?
> Getting it into the patch system would be a big help, but since I've
> closed my tree down for this merge window already, it's missed the
> boat. (With Linus' new "random" behaviour wrt when things happen, I'm
> not planning on a second ARM kernel pull request - and the first was
> sent last night.)
It's there now:
Anything I can do to make a second pull request happen? There are
quite a few patches that depend on this one, so I posted it well in
advace at March 10. The patch was kindly reviewed by you a bit later.
And now I got an ack. Unfortunately I didn't proceed and submit it to
the ARM-specific patch tracking system.
> This is probably the patch I was referring to in my notice of closure
> when I said:
> | I know there was someone who was complaining a week or so ago that I
> | hadn't applied their patch, which was only sent to the mailing list.
> | Unfortunately, it being only on the mailing list and not in the patch
> | system means I can't find it, nor the complaint about it not being
> | applied.
> | Whoever it was, sorry.
> Especially as it's 4000 messages back in this mailbox!
Sounds painful. =)
Thanks for your help!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel