[PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor autoloading feature
Venkatraman S
svenkatr at ti.com
Thu May 6 04:56:56 EDT 2010
Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: svenkatr at gmail.com [mailto:svenkatr at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Venkatraman S
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 9:49 PM
>> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
>> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.arm.linux.org.uk;
>> Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; Adrian Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; Tony Lindgren
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor autoloading feature
>>
>> [Long sections have been trimmed to the context of discussion]
>> Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: svenkatr at gmail.com [mailto:svenkatr at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Venkatraman S
>> >> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:05 PM
>> >> To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.arm.linux.org.uk
>> >> Cc: Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; Adrian Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; Shilimkar, Santosh; Tony
>> >> Lindgren
>> >> Subject: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor autoloading feature
>> >>
>> >> From 1c63dd42fc6c563c931168779ce73401332faa52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> From: Venkatraman S <svenkatr at ti.com>
>> >> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:43:31 +0530
>> >> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
>> >> autoloading feature
>> >>
>> >> Start to use the sDMA descriptor autoloading feature.
>> >> For large datablocks, the MMC driver has to repeatedly setup,
>> >> program and teardown the dma channel for each element of the
>> >> sglist received in omap_hsmmc_request.
>> >>
>> >> By using descriptor autoloading, transfers from / to each element of
>> >> the sglist is pre programmed into a linked list. The sDMA driver
>> >> completes the entire transaction and provides a single interrupt.
>> >>
>> >> Due to this, number of dma interrupts for a typical 100MB transfer on the MMC is
>> >> reduced from 25000 to about 400 (approximate). Transfer speeds are
>> >> improved by ~5%.
>> >> (Though it varies on the size of read / write & improves on huge transfers)
>> >>
>> >> Descriptor autoloading is available only in 3630 and 4430 (as of now).
>> >> Hence normal DMA mode is also retained.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr at ti.com>
>> >> CC: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter at nokia.com>
>> >> CC: Madhusudhan C <madhu.cr at ti.com>
>> >> CC: Shilimkar Santosh <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>> >> CC: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> Changes since previous version
>> >> * Rebased to Adrian Hunter's interrupt syncronisation patch
>> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/94670/
>> >> * Rename ICR name definition
>> >> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >> 1 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> >> index 65093d4..095fd94 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> >> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@
>> >> #define SRD (1 << 26)
>> >> #define SOFTRESET (1 << 1)
>> >> #define RESETDONE (1 << 0)
>> >> +/* End of superblock indicator for sglist transfers */
>> >> +#define DMA_ICR_SGLIST_END 0x4D00
>> >>
>> >> /*
>> >> * FIXME: Most likely all the data using these _DEVID defines should come
>> >> @@ -118,6 +120,12 @@
>> >> #define OMAP_MMC_MASTER_CLOCK 96000000
>> >> #define DRIVER_NAME "mmci-omap-hs"
>> >>
>> >> +#define DMA_TYPE_NODMA 0
>> > " DMA_TYPE_NODMA" doesn't make sense
>> >> +#define DMA_TYPE_SDMA 1
>> >> +#define DMA_TYPE_SDMA_DLOAD 2
>> >
>> > How about ??
>> > #define TRANSFER_NODMA 0
>> > #define TRANSFER_SDMA_NORMAL 1
>> > #define TRANSFER_SDMA_DESCRIPTOR 2
>> > I think ADMA is also in pipeline, so it can become then
>> > #define TRANSFER_ADMA_DESCRIPTOR 3
>>
>> Yes I was planning to use 3 for ADMA, but the names don't
>> make a big difference.
>>
> Good. Name does makes the difference when somebody reads the code.
> " DMA_TYPE_NODMA" what you make out from this if somebody has no
> background of what patch is doing.
How about DMA_TYPE_NONE ?
>
>> >> +
>> >> +#define DMA_CTRL_BUF_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE * 3)
>> >> +
>> >> /* Timeouts for entering power saving states on inactivity, msec */
>> >> #define OMAP_MMC_DISABLED_TIMEOUT 100
>> >> #define OMAP_MMC_SLEEP_TIMEOUT 1000
>> >> @@ -170,7 +178,11 @@ struct omap_hsmmc_host {
>> >> u32 bytesleft;
>> >> int suspended;
>> >> int irq;
>> >> - int use_dma, dma_ch;
>> >> + int dma_caps;
>> >> + int dma_in_use;
>> > This flag isn't necessary. What you are doing is
>> > just renaming it. Can't you avoid that ??
>> > Inudertand the intent behind "dma_in_use " instead
>> > of "use_dma", but you can surely avoid this change.
>>
>> Actually there is a shift in the meaning of these variables
>> so I believe the change is necessary.
>> With my changes, the type of DMA to use (SDMA, SDMA_DESC_LOAD)
>> [and in the future NODMA, ADMA] can vary on a per transfer basis.
>> Previously use_dma was a static capability variable of whether DMA
>> was available. That has been move to dma_caps. The dma_in_use,
>> as the name more intuitively suggests, keeps track of the type of transfer
>> used in the current transaction.
>>
> I still feel it's no necessary considering the no. of lines gets changed because
> of this.
> You take a call. I am fine with it.
>>
>> >> {
>> >> unsigned int irq_mask;
>> >>
>> >> - if (host->use_dma)
>> >> + if (host->dma_in_use)
>> > This will go with no flag change.
>>
>> Explanation as above
>>
>> >> irq_mask = INT_EN_MASK & ~(BRR_ENABLE | BWR_ENABLE);
>> >> else
>> >> irq_mask = INT_EN_MASK;
>> >> @@ -813,7 +825,7 @@ omap_hsmmc_start_command(struct omap_hsmmc_host
>> >> *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
>> >> cmdreg &= ~(DDIR);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> - if (host->use_dma)
>> >> + if (host->dma_in_use)
>> > ditto
>> >> cmdreg |= DMA_EN;
>> >>
>> >> host->req_in_progress = 1;
> <snip ..>
>
>
>> >> +static int omap_hsmmc_configure_sdma_sglist(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
>> >> + struct mmc_request *req)
>> >> +{
>> >> + int i;
>> >> + struct omap_dma_sglist_node *sglist, *snode;
>> >> + struct mmc_data *data = req->data;
>> >> + int blksz;
>> >> + int dmadir = omap_hsmmc_get_dma_dir(host, data);
>> >> + struct omap_dma_sglist_type2a_params *t2p;
>> >> +
>> >> + sglist = (struct omap_dma_sglist_node *) host->dma_ctrl_buf;
>> >> + snode = sglist;
>> >> + blksz = host->data->blksz;
>> >> +
>> >> + if ((host->dma_len * sizeof(*snode)) > DMA_CTRL_BUF_SIZE) {
>> >> + dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "not enough sglist memory %d\n",
>> >> + host->dma_len);
>> >> + return -ENOMEM;
>> >> + }
>> >> + for (i = 0; i < host->dma_len; snode++, i++) {
>> >> + snode->desc_type = OMAP_DMA_SGLIST_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE2a;
>> >> + snode->num_of_elem = blksz / 4;
>> >> + t2p = &snode->sg_node.t2a;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (dmadir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
>> >> + t2p->src_addr = host->mapbase + OMAP_HSMMC_DATA;
>> >> + t2p->dst_addr = sg_dma_address(data->sg + i);
>> >> + } else {
>> >> + t2p->dst_addr = host->mapbase + OMAP_HSMMC_DATA;
>> >> + t2p->src_addr = sg_dma_address(data->sg + i);
>> >> + }
>> >> + snode->flags =
>> >> + OMAP_DMA_LIST_DST_VALID | OMAP_DMA_LIST_SRC_VALID;
>> >> +
>> >> + t2p->cfn_fn = sg_dma_len(data->sg + i) / host->data->blksz;
>> >> + t2p->cicr = DMA_ICR_SGLIST_END;
>> >> +
>> >> + t2p->dst_frame_idx_or_pkt_size = 0;
>> >> + t2p->src_frame_idx_or_pkt_size = 0;
>> >> + t2p->dst_elem_idx = 0;
>> >> + t2p->src_elem_idx = 0;
>> >> + }
>> >> + dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "new sglist %x len =%d\n",
>> >> + host->dma_ctrl_buf_phy, i);
>> >> + omap_set_dma_sglist_mode(host->dma_ch, sglist,
>> >> + host->dma_ctrl_buf_phy, i, NULL);
>> >> + omap_dma_set_sglist_fastmode(host->dma_ch, 1);
>> >
>> > You should check for return value of above two. If any one of above fails
>> > the transfer will fail BADLY
>>
>> These functions have no return code (Similar to omap_start_dma, which doesn't
>> have return code either)
>
> Are you sure ? Here is the function body.
>
> +int omap_set_dma_sglist_mode(int lch, struct omap_dma_sglist_node *sgparams,
> + dma_addr_t padd, int nelem, struct omap_dma_channel_params *chparams)
> +{
> + struct omap_dma_list_config_params *lcfg;
> + int l = DMA_LIST_CDP_LISTMODE; /* Enable Linked list mode in CDP */
> +
> + if ((dma_caps0_status & DMA_CAPS_SGLIST_SUPPORT) == 0) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "omap DMA: sglist feature not supported\n");
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> + if (dma_chan[lch].flags & OMAP_DMA_ACTIVE) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "omap DMA: configuring active DMA channel\n");
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> +
> + if (padd == 0) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "omap DMA: sglist invalid dma_addr\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + lcfg = &dma_chan[lch].list_config;
> +
> + lcfg->sghead = sgparams;
> + lcfg->num_elem = nelem;
> + lcfg->sgheadphy = padd;
> + lcfg->pausenode = -1;
> +
> +
> + if (NULL == chparams)
> + l |= DMA_LIST_CDP_FASTMODE;
> + else
> + omap_set_dma_params(lch, chparams);
> +
> + dma_write(l, CDP(lch));
> + dma_write(0, CCDN(lch)); /* Reset List index numbering */
> + /* Initialize frame and element counters to invalid values */
> + dma_write(OMAP_DMA_INVALID_FRAME_COUNT, CCFN(lch));
> + dma_write(OMAP_DMA_INVALID_ELEM_COUNT, CCEN(lch));
> +
> + return dma_sglist_set_phy_params(sgparams, lcfg->sgheadphy,
> + nelem, dma_read(CICR(lch)));
> +
> +}
>
OK. I missed that.
>
>>
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> static void set_data_timeout(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
>> >> unsigned int timeout_ns,
>> >> unsigned int timeout_clks)
>> >> @@ -1420,14 +1492,23 @@ omap_hsmmc_prepare_data(struct omap_hsmmc_host
>> >> *host, struct mmc_request *req)
>> >> | (req->data->blocks << 16));
>> >> set_data_timeout(host, req->data->timeout_ns, req->data->timeout_clks);
>> >>
>> >> - if (host->use_dma) {
>> >> - ret = omap_hsmmc_start_dma_transfer(host, req);
>> >> - if (ret != 0) {
>> >> - dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "MMC start dma failure\n");
>> >> + if (host->dma_caps & DMA_TYPE_SDMA) {
>> >> + ret = omap_hsmmc_configure_sdma(host, req);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> return ret;
>> >> - }
>> >> + host->dma_in_use = DMA_TYPE_SDMA;
>> >> }
>> >> - return 0;
>> >> + if ((host->dma_caps & DMA_TYPE_SDMA_DLOAD) &&
>> >> + host->data->sg_len > 4) {
>> >> + ret = omap_hsmmc_configure_sdma_sglist(host, req);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + return ret;
>> >> + host->dma_in_use = DMA_TYPE_SDMA_DLOAD;
>> >> +
>> >> + }
>> >> + ret = omap_hsmmc_start_dma_transfer(host);
>> >> + return ret;
>> >> +
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> /*
>> >> @@ -2007,7 +2088,9 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
>> >> platform_device *pdev)
>> >> host->mmc = mmc;
>> >> host->pdata = pdata;
>> >> host->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> >> - host->use_dma = 1;
>> >> + host->dma_caps = DMA_TYPE_SDMA;
>> >> + host->dma_in_use = DMA_TYPE_NODMA;
>> >> + host->dma_ctrl_buf = NULL;
>> >> host->dev->dma_mask = &pdata->dma_mask;
>> >> host->dma_ch = -1;
>> >> host->irq = irq;
>> >> @@ -2088,6 +2171,15 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
>> >> platform_device *pdev)
>> >> " clk failed\n");
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> + if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
>> > Can we avoid above by passing this part of platform data??
>> > devices.c
>>
>> I am not clear about the method. The board files export the
>> omap_mmc_platform_data.
>> Does it imply that all board files have to change and export
>> the capability so that it can be queried ?
> No. You don't have to modify the board files. This would need
> change in devices.c which common for all omap boards.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on this point but just put forth an
> alternate way to avoid such SOC specific check in drivers.
> You can take call on this
Thanks. I will go with Madhu's vote now. With ADMA and other features
coming in, I'll think of a generic way to export the capabilities
from the platform data.
/Venkat.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list