[PATCH 1/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: Fix for the use of wrong CPU_FREQ code in nanoengine.

[Marcelo Jimenez]

Hi Kristoffer,

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 19:07, Kristoffer Ericson
<kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:53:10 -0300
> Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto at cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>
>> This patch selects the right CPU_FREQ module to use with nanoengine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto at cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
>
> I think you should add more information regarding the patch.
> Like addition of memory, extending the sdram_params->name length,
> Cleaning up header content and order.
> Just looking at the commit message it doesnt cover everything thats done.

Ok, will do that.

> Also, for me this doesnt apply at all. It might be my setup
> being corrupt, but is it synced with latest git?
>
> Patch number 2 doesnt either apply for me.

Sorry, they depend upon my first patch set, the one that adds
nanoengine back to the kernel. I thought about merging it with the
first, but I also thought it might cause confusion if someone had
already applied it:

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.200959.9dd2e2d1.en.html

The other patches are:

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201022.58a74029.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201023.17169815.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201024.d78c81ac.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201025.b9812efa.en.html

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100312.142346.0f32234c.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100312.142347.0c7e0e21.en.html

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100324.230457.f07b83bd.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100324.234510.4e6f1816.en.html

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100326.215310.ba4ef076.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100326.215311.ce1245a0.en.html

A total of eleven patches. The only dependency up to now is that the
last patch depends on the first.

> Best wishes
> Kristoffer

Regards,
Marcelo.