[GIT PULL] generic arm for MSM

Daniel Walker dwalker at codeaurora.org
Thu Mar 25 18:49:24 EDT 2010

On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:46 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > These are all mostly small patches that I've sent out a few times with
> > no comments. Let me know if you see any issues.
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 7ee744f22ffad619e23912a22d1b2795e10ed825:
> >   Stephen Rothwell (1):
> >         Add linux-next specific files for 20100324
> Never base your tree on linux-next.  You really should use a stable 
> tree, such as Linus' tree.  The linux-next tree is constantly thrown 
> away and rebuilt, and your own tree will keep a reference on that 
> obsoleted linux-next version otherwise.

I only based this pull request on next , since I can't get Russell tree
anyplace else. I've had patches in the past which I've had to use next
cause there are underlying changes that I can only find in next .. So no
I don't base development trees on next generally.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list