ARM caches variants.

[Catalin Marinas]

On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:59 +0000, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:15 +0000, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:39 +0000, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >>>> Now, the stupid question: why not using the cache colouring technique
> >>>> used for VIPT caches to solve issue #3 with VIVT caches?
> >>> Because with aliasing VIPT it is guaranteed that if a virtual address
> >>> has the same offset in a 16KB block (i.e. the same colour - there are
> >>> only 4 colours given by bits 13 and 12 of the virtual address), you get
> >>> the same cache line allocated for a given physical address. The tag of a
> >>> cache line is given by bits 31..14 of the physical address.
> >>>
> >>> With VIVT, the cache tags are not aware of the physical address, hence
> >>> you can have 2^20 colours (bits 31..12 of the virtual address). You
> >>> would need to map a physical address at the same virtual address in all
> >>> applications sharing it (and you may end up with uClinux :)).
> >> Ok. I do not get it. Let us do it in slow motion: as I understand, the
> >> problem with issue #2 and #3 is not really about the tag, but about two
> >> different virtual addresses ending up using different cache lines,
> >> whatever the tag. By using cache colouring, can not we ensure that they
> >> end up in the same cache line and simply evict each other because they
> >> do not have the same tag?
> >>
> >> In other word, is not the cache line used by virtual address addr:
> >> (addr % cache size) / (cache line size)
> >
> > With any cache line, you have an index and a tag for identifying it. The
> > cache may have multiple ways (e.g. 4-way associative) to speed up the
> > look-up. For a 32KB 4-way associative cache you have 8KB per way (2^13).
> >
> > If the cache line size is 32B (2^5), the index of a cache line is:
> >
> > addr & (2^13 - 1) >> 5
> >
> > e.g. bits 12..5 from the VA are used for indexing the cache line.
> >
> > The tag is given by the rest of the top bits, in the above case bits
> > 31..13 of the VA (if VIVT cache) or PA (VIPT cache).
> >
> > The cache look-up for a VA goes something like this:
> >
> >      1. extracts the index. With a 4-way associative cache there are 4
> >         possible cache lines for this index
> >      2. extracts the tag (from either VA or PA, depending on the cache
> >         type). For VIPT caches, it needs to do a TLB look-up as well to
> >         find the physical address
> >      3. check the four cache lines identified by the index at step 1
> >         against their tag
> >      4. if the tag matches, you get a hit, otherwise a miss
> >
> > For your #2 and #3 issues, if two processes map the same PA using
> > different VAs, data can end up pretty much anywhere in a VIVT cache. If
> > you calculate the index and tag (used to identify a cache line) for two
> > different VAs, the only common part are bits 11..5 of the index (since
> > they are inside a page). If you want to have the same index and tag for
> > the two different VAs, you end up with having to use the same VA in both
> > processes.
> >
> > With VIPT caches, the tag is the same for issues #2 and #3. The only
> > difference may be in a few top bits of the index. In the above case,
> > it's bit 12 of the VA which may differ. This gives you two page colours
> > (with 64KB 4-way associative cache you have 2 bits for the colour
> > resulting in 4 colours).
> >
> 
> Thanks for the explanation, I need to read your e-mail in detail to
> understand it fully. It seemed to me that having the same index was
> enough to solve issues #2 and #3, and that it was possible by using
> cache coulouring, but as I understand, the fact that a cache can have
> multiple ways means that the same index can index several cache lines.

Even if you have a 1-way associative cache (some processors allow the
disabling of the other 3 ways if you want to try), the tag stored with
the cache line is different between different VAs on a VIVT cache.

So with two different VAs mapping the same PA, if a VA0 access allocates
the cache line and VA1 would find the same cache line via the index
calculation, it would get a cache miss because the tags for VA0 and VA1
do not match.

-- 
Catalin