[PATCH 1/3] watchdog: Add support for the Freescale MXC watchdog
Vladimir Zapolskiy
vzapolskiy at gmail.com
Sat Mar 20 14:40:07 EDT 2010
Wolfram Sang <w.sang at pengutronix.de> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:13:27PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Add driver for the Freescale MXC SoCs built-in watchdog.
>
> Any improvements over/differences to this one?
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/70753
>
> (Read the thread for the comments I received)
>
> Coincidence, I wanted to pick up my version and finish it next week. We have to
> agree how to continue. I like mine a tad better (there are some mixups of
> MX1/2+ capabilities in yours, e.g. SETTIMEOUT) and it also got review already,
> but of course I am biased ;) What do you suggest?
>
> Regards,
>
> Wolfram
Hi Wolfram,
that's a surprise for me, haven't noticed your version of the driver in
the maillist, and wrote one more watchdog driver :)
The driver is extremely simple, so from my biased position only minor
benefits can be found in my version:
* introduced spinlock to protect concurrent write to registers
* SETTIMEOUT option is present and it works well on imx31
* correct zero byte write()
* clock enabled only when watchdog node is opened
* dynamic wdt structure, which potentially simplifies future support of
several watchdogs found on imx51 and imx37 IIRC
* no critical message on close with unset NOWAYOUT on non-imx1 SoCs
Your pretty good version supports imx1, and I cann't test my version on
imx1, because I don't have such hardware on hand.
Obviously better to update your reviewed one, and I hope some comments or even
updates from my side could be accepted by you :)
With best wishes,
Vladimir
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list