USB mass storage and ARM cache coherency
FUJITA Tomonori
fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp
Tue Mar 2 22:47:11 EST 2010
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:29:54 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:05 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > The viable solutions so far:
> >
> > 1. Implement a PIO mapping API similar to the DMA API which takes
> > care of the D-cache flushing. This means that PIO drivers would
> > need to be modified to use an API like pio_kmap()/pio_kunmap()
> > before writing to a page cache page.
> > 2. Invert the meaning of PG_arch_1 to denote a clean page. This
> > means that by default newly allocated page cache pages are
> > considered dirty and even if there isn't a call to
> > flush_dcache_page(), update_mmu_cache() would flush the D-cache.
> > This is the PowerPC approach.
>
> I don't see the point of a "PIO" API. I would thus vote for 2 :-) Note
Yeah, as powerpc and ia64 do, arm can flush D cache and invalidate I
cache when inserting a executable page to pte, IIUC. No need for the
new API for I/D consistency.
The ways to improve the approach (introducing PG_arch_2 or marking a
page clean on dma_unmap_* with DMA_FROM_DEVICE like ia64 does) is up
to architectures.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list