[PATCH 1/2] arm: Replace CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG with HWCAP_TLS and check for it on V6
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Tue Jun 29 10:18:36 EDT 2010
* Jamie Lokier <jamie at shareable.org> [100623 16:30]:
> Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Jamie Lokier <jamie at shareable.org> [100622 19:54]:
> > > Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > __kuser_get_tls: @ 0xffff0fe0
> > > > -
> > > > -#if !defined(CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG) && !defined(CONFIG_TLS_REG_EMUL)
> > > > - ldr r0, [pc, #(16 - 8)] @ TLS stored at 0xffff0ff0
> > > > -#else
> > > > - mrc p15, 0, r0, c13, c0, 3 @ read TLS register
> > > > -#endif
> > > > + ldr r0, [pc, #(20 - 8)] @ software TLS set in 0xffff0ff4?
> > > > + cmp r0, #0 @ hardware TLS if flag not set
> > > > + mrceq p15, 0, r0, c13, c0, 3 @ read hardware TLS register
> > > > + ldrne r0, [pc, #(12 - 8)] @ software TLS val at 0xffff0ff8
> > > > usr_ret lr
> > > > -
> > > > - .rep 5
> > > > - .word 0 @ pad up to __kuser_helper_version
> > > > - .endr
> > > > + .word 0 @ non-zero for software TLS
> > > > + .word 0 @ software TLS value
> > >
> > > It'd be nice not to waste instructions checking for HWCAP_TLS on archs
> > > which definitely don't have it. I guess it doesn't matter elsewhere;
> > > I'd expect this to be a warm path for some programs making extensive
> > > use of TLS (I haven't measured though).
> >
> > OK, but let's try to figure out a way that does not add more ifdef else
> > code as that makes it harder to build support for multiple ARM cores.
> >
> > > As it's only a single instruction, and the code is in a writable page
> > > already (copied at init), how about just patching the instruction
> > > when ELF_HWCAP is set?
> >
> > Yeah that can be done for __kuser_get_tls if it's always writable.
> > But __switch_to is trickier because of the CONFIG_MMU ifdefs there.
>
> __kuser_get_tls must be writable in kernels where !HAS_TLS_REG is
> supported, because the TLS value is written to the same page.
>
> I was thinking of changing *only* __kuser_get_tls, by the way. Out of
> all the different places, that's the only one I'd expect to be a hot
> path in some TLS-using programs.
OK. Sorry for the delay again. Here's an updated version that sets
__kuser_get_tls instruction dynamically. Does this do what you were
thinking, or did I miss something?
Also, can we detect somehow the hardware that uses CONFIG_TLS_REG_EMUL?
Might be possible to remove that Kconfig option too later on..
Regards,
Tony
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: arm-tls-v3.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7349 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100629/99ddda56/attachment.bin>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list