kprobe bug.
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Fri Jun 25 16:49:51 EDT 2010
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Bin Yang wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Thanks in advance for your kind to review my question.
> I met a kprobe bug while I used it to debug my driver.
> Here is the scenario:
> I add a probe at function xxx(). And the assembly code of xxx() is as following,
> =====================
> c035ee48 <xxx >:
> c035ee48: e59f3008 ldr r3, [pc, #8] ; c035ee58 <xxx+0x10>
> c035ee4c: e3a02001 mov r2, #1 ; 0x1
> c035ee50: e5032fff str r2, [r3, #-4095]
> c035ee54: e12fff1e bx lr
> c035ee58: fe03dfff .word 0xfe03dfff
> =====================
> The ldr emulate always load e12fff1e to r3 register.
> After debugging, I found the pc register should be 8 after current instruction. So we should set pc to pc+8 before instruction emulation and set it back to the next instruction after singe step.
> Here is my patch:
> =======================
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 60c62c3..6e2567e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -132,8 +132,9 @@ static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> static void __kprobes singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> {
> - regs->ARM_pc += 4;
> + regs->ARM_pc += 8;
> p->ainsn.insn_handler(p, regs);
> + regs->ARM_pc -= 4;
> }
>
> /*
> ========================
This is wrong. You are breaking all the emulated instructions changing
the pc value.
What needs to be done is to add a special case in emulate_ldr() to fixup
rnv when rn is 15. The same fixup would be needed in emulate_str().
See emulate_alu_rflags() for example.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list