Eric Bénard
eric at eukrea.com
Fri Jun 25 03:23:49 EDT 2010
Le 25/06/2010 09:17, Uwe Kleine-König a écrit :
>>> but not used with the config I tested. And it would have been more
>>> consistent to name your machine source file mach-eukrea_cpuimx25.c.
>>>
>> OK so this would require the same renaming for cpuimx27& 35 as actually
>> its consitent between the 3 boards. Should I send a patch to rename them
>> ?
> If you don't, then I will do :-) I would recommend to wait until Sascha
> merged though.
>
OK will do.
> While testing I found another problem. There are two definitions of
> MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD_BASEBOARD that conflict. For me
> MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD_BASEBOARD doesn't appear in .config if I select
> MACH_EUKREA_CPUIMX25.
>
Yes I saw this after tewting Sascha's tree as I was initialy working on
different branches. I would have expected Kconfig to not care about the
one of the unselected architecture but that not the case.
Please see the patch I just sent to merge the baseboard support in one file.
Eric
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list