gpiolib and sleeping gpios
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Mon Jun 21 01:09:57 EDT 2010
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 07:40:46PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > And they will trigger runtime warnings, and
> > > thus eventually get fixed.
> > \
> > }
> > err = gpio_request(some_gpio, "some_gpio",
> > GPIOF_NO_SLEEP);
> NAK ... keep it simple. Such flags are
> clearly not necessary...
> I understand that some folk are bothered
> by concepts/frameworks that seem "too simple"
> and thus want to complexify them. In this
> case I am in a position to help avoid that.
> Complexity is not a virtue.
I'm against such an additional flag, too. But I still think merging
gpio_get_value and gpio_get_value_cansleep is nice.
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel