Several questions regarding ARCH_S3C2410

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Eric Miao wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux at fluff.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:43:37AM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >>
> >> While working towards a unified kernel, I found that ARCH_S3C2410 actually
> >> includes multiple mach-* already.
> >>
> >> linux-2.6$ git grep "ARCH_S3C2410" arch/arm/Makefile
> >> arch/arm/Makefile:machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C2410)      := s3c2410 s3c2400
> >> s3c2412 s3c2416 s3c2440 s3c2443
> >>
> >> There are several questions though:
> >>
> >> 1. It looks like only s3c2410 is significant, so all the common definitions
> >>    like PHYS_OFFSET are actually same across all mach-s3c24* (except for
> >>    s3c24a0) ? Yet I've found arch/arm/mach-s3c2400/include/mach/memory.h,
> >>    where a different PHYS_OFFSET is defined, just feel a bit confused.
> >
> > You can safely ignore the s3c24a0 for the moment, there's no-one interested
> > in actually getting it submitted.
> 
> Grrr... indeed.Looking into mach-s3c24a0, it's almost empty except for some
> header files.

What about simply removing that useless stuff from the tree then?

It could always be retrieved from the Git history if someone wants to 
revive it.


Nicolas