[PATCH] mailbox: change full flag per mailbox queue instead of global
Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.lugo at ti.com
Thu Jun 17 12:42:41 EDT 2010
Hi Ohad,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:ohad at wizery.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:18 PM
> To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org;
> hiroshi.doyu at nokia.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: change full flag per mailbox queue instead
> of global
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840 at ti.com>
> wrote:
> > As pointed by Ben Ohand, the variable rq_full flag is a global
> > variable, so if there are multiple mailbox users there will be
> > conflics. Now there is a full flag per mailbox queue.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad at wizery.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840 at ti.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h | 1 +
> > arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c | 7 +++----
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> Thanks, Fernando, it looks good !
>
> Since the original patch wasn't merged yet, it might make more sense
> to squash it with this fix into a single patch, instead of introducing
> this fix as a new patch. what do you think ?
Sound good. I will send that patch again then. Please discard this pathc.
Regards,
Fernando.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h b/arch/arm/plat-
> omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> > index 729166b..a6144b8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct omap_mbox_queue {
> > struct tasklet_struct tasklet;
> > int (*callback)(void *);
> > struct omap_mbox *mbox;
> > + bool full;
> > };
> >
> > struct omap_mbox {
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> > index 8d86b0b..a1e274e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
> >
> > static struct omap_mbox *mboxes;
> > static DEFINE_RWLOCK(mboxes_lock);
> > -static bool rq_full;
> >
> > static int mbox_configured;
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(mbox_configured_lock);
> > @@ -140,9 +139,9 @@ static void mbox_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > while (1) {
> > spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
> > rq = blk_fetch_request(q);
> > - if (rq_full) {
> > + if (mbox->rxq->full) {
> > omap_mbox_enable_irq(mbox, IRQ_RX);
> > - rq_full = false;
> > + mbox->rxq->full = false;
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
> > if (!rq)
> > @@ -183,7 +182,7 @@ static void __mbox_rx_interrupt(struct omap_mbox
> *mbox)
> > rq = blk_get_request(q, WRITE, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > if (unlikely(!rq)) {
> > omap_mbox_disable_irq(mbox, IRQ_RX);
> > - rq_full = true;
> > + mbox->rxq->full = true;
> > goto nomem;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.6.3.3
> >
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list