[PATCH 2/2] ehci-mxc: bail out on transceiver problems
Daniel Mack
daniel at caiaq.de
Tue Jun 15 06:43:42 EDT 2010
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:34:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> The old code registered the hcd even if there were no transceivers
> detected, leading to oopses like this if we try to probe a non-existant
> ULPI:
Hmm. I'm aware that there was a missing bail in this function, but
actually, I had hardware which didn't properly detect the ULPI chip but
still worked fine. There has been quite some discussion here about that,
and eventually I decided to not make this a hard error as it didn't
really harm.
> [ 2.730000] mxc-ehci mxc-ehci.0: unable to init transceiver
> [ 2.740000] timeout polling for ULPI device
> [ 2.740000] timeout polling for ULPI device
> [ 2.750000] mxc-ehci mxc-ehci.0: unable to enable vbus on transceiver
> [ 2.750000] mxc-ehci mxc-ehci.0: Freescale On-Chip EHCI Host Controller
> [ 2.760000] mxc-ehci mxc-ehci.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
> [ 2.770000] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x808) at 0xc4876184
> [ 2.770000] Internal error: : 808 [#1] PREEMPT
> [ 2.770000] last sysfs file:
> [ 2.770000] Modules linked in:
> [ 2.770000] CPU: 0 Not tainted (2.6.33.5 #5)
> [ 2.770000] PC is at ehci_hub_control+0x4d4/0x8f8
> [ 2.770000] LR is at ehci_mxc_setup+0xbc/0xdc
> [ 2.770000] pc : [<c0196dfc>] lr : [<c019bc8c>] psr: 00000093
> [ 2.770000] sp : c3815e40 ip : 00000001 fp : 60000013
> [ 2.770000] r10: c4876184 r9 : 00000000 r8 : c3814000
> [ 2.770000] r7 : c391d2cc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000001 r4 : 00000000
> [ 2.770000] r3 : 80000000 r2 : 00000007 r1 : 80000000 r0 : c4876184
> [ 2.770000] Flags: nzcv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment kernel
> [ 2.770000] Control: 0005317f Table: a0004000 DAC: 00000017
> [ 2.770000] Process swapper (pid: 1, stack limit = 0xc3814270)
But that, of course, changes everthing. If you happen to see such
Ooopses, your patch should go in, and I will check the boards again and
see if they still fail to probe the ULPI. Eventually, we might need some
kind of quirks field in the platform data :(
Thanks,
Daniel
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel at caiaq.de>
> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh at suse.de>
> Cc: stable at kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c
> index 544ccfd..bd40277 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c
> @@ -207,10 +207,17 @@ static int ehci_mxc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Initialize the transceiver */
> if (pdata->otg) {
> pdata->otg->io_priv = hcd->regs + ULPI_VIEWPORT_OFFSET;
> - if (otg_init(pdata->otg) != 0)
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to init transceiver\n");
> - else if (otg_set_vbus(pdata->otg, 1) != 0)
> + ret = otg_init(pdata->otg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to init transceiver, probably missing\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_add;
> + }
> + ret = otg_set_vbus(pdata->otg, 1);
> + if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "unable to enable vbus on transceiver\n");
> + goto err_add;
> + }
> }
>
> priv->hcd = hcd;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list