[PATCH 3/3 v4] [ARM] Kirkwood: add support for PCIe1
saeed bishara
saeed.bishara at gmail.com
Tue Jun 8 08:49:43 EDT 2010
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Benjamin Zores
<benjamin.zores at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 14:20, saeed bishara wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Benjamin Zores
>> <benjamin.zores at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 08/06/2010 13:21, Saeed Bishara wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> @@ -106,17 +108,21 @@ void __init kirkwood_setup_cpu_mbus(void)
>>>> TARGET_PCIE, ATTR_PCIE_IO,
>>>> KIRKWOOD_PCIE_IO_BUS_BASE);
>>>> setup_cpu_win(1, KIRKWOOD_PCIE_MEM_PHYS_BASE,
>>>> KIRKWOOD_PCIE_MEM_SIZE,
>>>> TARGET_PCIE, ATTR_PCIE_MEM,
>>>> KIRKWOOD_PCIE_MEM_BUS_BASE);
>>>> + setup_cpu_win(2, KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_IO_PHYS_BASE,
>>>> KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_IO_SIZE,
>>>> + TARGET_PCIE, ATTR_PCIE1_IO,
>>>> KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_IO_BUS_BASE);
>>>> + setup_cpu_win(3, KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS_BASE,
>>>> KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_MEM_SIZE,
>>>> + TARGET_PCIE, ATTR_PCIE1_MEM,
>>>> KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_MEM_BUS_BASE);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd have used an id, and incremented it at each setup_cpu_win() call.
>>> Also only doing the last 2 calls on 6282.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> /* Make sure those units are accessible */
>>>> - writel(curr | CGC_SATA0 | CGC_SATA1 | CGC_PEX0,
>>>> CLOCK_GATING_CTRL);
>>>> + writel(curr | CGC_SATA0 | CGC_SATA1 | CGC_PEX0 | CGC_PEX1,
>>>> CLOCK_GATING_CTRL);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why not (pseudo code):
>>>
>>> int flags = curr | CGC_SATA0 | CGC_SATA1 | CGC_PEX0;
>>> if (6282) flags |= CGC_PEX1;
>>> writel(flags, ...);
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> + /* For PCIe 1: first shutdown the phy */
>>>> + if (dev == MV88F6282_DEV_ID) {
>>>> + if (!(kirkwood_clk_ctrl& CGC_PEX1)) {
>>>> + writel(readl(PCIE1_LINK_CTRL) | 0x10,
>>>> PCIE1_LINK_CTRL);
>>>> + while (1)
>>>> + if (readl(PCIE1_STATUS)& 0x1)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + writel(readl(PCIE1_LINK_CTRL)& ~0x10,
>>>> PCIE1_LINK_CTRL);
>>>> + }
>>>> + } else /* keep this bit set for devices that don't have PCIe1
>>>> */
>>>> + kirkwood_clk_ctrl |= CGC_PEX1;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> the else part is useless with the proposal above i guess.
>>>
>>> Except from that, when using your patch I was unable to boot kernel
>>> anymore
>>> on 6281 boards.
>>>
>>
>> can you try the patch I send regarding nand mpps?
>>
>
> Unfortunately no, I'm running on OpenRD currently.
does it boot if you remove the kirkwood_nand_init?
> Ben
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list