[PATCH] ARM: update show_interrupts for online cpu's only
Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Sat Jul 31 10:08:53 EDT 2010
Even after CPUx is logically offline, it's interrupt are displayed
in proc entry
This patch fixes the same by use of 'for_each_online_cpu' instead
of 'for_each_present_cpu' in 'show_interrupts' function
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
index 3b3d2c8..cfab369 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
char cpuname[12];
seq_printf(p, " ");
- for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
sprintf(cpuname, "CPU%d", cpu);
seq_printf(p, " %10s", cpuname);
}
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
goto unlock;
seq_printf(p, "%3d: ", i);
- for_each_present_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
seq_printf(p, "%10u ", kstat_irqs_cpu(i, cpu));
seq_printf(p, " %10s", irq_desc[i].chip->name ? : "-");
seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name);
--
1.6.0.4
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list