[PATCH 4/4] sdhci-s3c: add regulator support
Maurus Cuelenaere
mcuelenaere at gmail.com
Wed Jul 28 10:48:06 EDT 2010
Op 28-07-10 16:19, Marek Szyprowski schreef:
> This patch adds support for regulator API to sdhci-s3c driver. Regulators
> can be used to disable power in suspended state to reduce dissipated
> energy.
I'm not sure about this, when I would try to do this I'd look at implementing
this in the sdhci driver itself instead of a subdriver of it.
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> index 606e695..b9d46a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>
> #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>
> @@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ struct sdhci_s3c {
>
> struct clk *clk_io;
> struct clk *clk_bus[MAX_BUS_CLK];
> + struct regulator *vmmc;
> };
>
> static inline struct sdhci_s3c *to_s3c(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -309,6 +311,13 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_s3c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, host);
>
> + sc->vmmc = regulator_get(dev, "vmmc");
> + if (IS_ERR(sc->vmmc)) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "no vmmc regulator found\n");
> + sc->vmmc = NULL;
> + } else
> + regulator_enable(sc->vmmc);
> +
> sc->clk_io = clk_get(dev, "hsmmc");
> if (IS_ERR(sc->clk_io)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to get io clock\n");
> @@ -482,6 +491,11 @@ static int __devexit sdhci_s3c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> clk_disable(sc->clk_io);
> clk_put(sc->clk_io);
>
> + if (sc->vmmc) {
> + regulator_disable(sc->vmmc);
> + regulator_put(sc->vmmc);
> + }
> +
> iounmap(host->ioaddr);
> release_resource(sc->ioarea);
> kfree(sc->ioarea);
> @@ -496,15 +510,29 @@ static int __devexit sdhci_s3c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int sdhci_s3c_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t pm)
> {
> + int ret = 0;
> struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct sdhci_s3c *sc = sdhci_priv(host);
>
> sdhci_suspend_host(host, pm);
> - return 0;
> +
> + if (sc->vmmc)
> + ret = regulator_disable(sc->vmmc);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int sdhci_s3c_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
> {
> struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct sdhci_s3c *sc = sdhci_priv(host);
> +
> + if (sc->vmmc) {
> + int ret = regulator_disable(sc->vmmc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + mdelay(2);
Shouldn't these delays be handled in the regulator framework itself?
> + }
>
> sdhci_resume_host(host);
> return 0;
--
Maurus Cuelenaere
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list