[PATCH 3/6] U6715 gpio platform driver This driver is U6XXX platform generic

[Philippe Langlais]

Hi,

I take into account all comments and I'll send a new U6 GPIO patch

Regards,
Philippe

On 07/15/10 13:18, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Thanks, this is much better.  Just a few remaining niggles.
>
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 05:21:50PM +0200, Philippe Langlais wrote:
>    
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/board_u67xx_wavex.c b/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/board_u67xx_wavex.c
>> index 633989f..235e80d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/board_u67xx_wavex.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/board_u67xx_wavex.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,473 @@
>>   #include<mach/hardware.h>
>>   #include<mach/irqs.h>
>>   #include<mach/timer.h>
>> +#include<mach/gpio.h>
>>      
> Should be linux/gpio.h
>
>    
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/devices.c
>> index 1d00b35..e88a106 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/devices.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-u67xx/devices.c
>> @@ -11,10 +11,78 @@
>>   #include<linux/kernel.h>
>>   #include<linux/init.h>
>>   #include<linux/device.h>
>> +#include<linux/ioport.h>
>>   #include<linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include<linux/fs.h>
>> +#include<linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include<mach/hardware.h>
>> +#include<mach/scon.h>
>> +#include<mach/gpio.h>
>>      
> You're already including linux/gpio.h, so this shouldn't be required.
>
>    
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-u6xxx/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-u6xxx/gpio.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..40205d2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-u6xxx/gpio.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,672 @@
>> +/*
>> + * linux/arch/arm/plat-u6xxx/gpio.c
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) ST-Ericsson SA 2010
>> + * Author: Loic Pallardy<loic.pallardy at stericsson.com>  for ST-Ericsson.
>> + * License terms:  GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2
>> + * Support functions for GPIO
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include<linux/init.h>
>> +#include<linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include<linux/module.h>
>> +#include<linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include<linux/sched.h>
>> +#include<linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include<linux/ptrace.h>
>> +#include<linux/sysdev.h>
>> +#include<linux/err.h>
>> +#include<linux/clk.h>
>> +#include<linux/io.h>
>> +
>> +#include<asm/irq.h>
>> +#include<asm/mach/irq.h>
>> +
>> +#include<mach/hardware.h>
>> +#include<mach/irqs.h>
>> +#include<mach/gpio.h>
>>      
> linux/gpio.h again please.
>
>    
>> +static struct platform_driver u6_gpio_driver = {
>> +	.probe = u6_gpio_probe,
>> +	.remove = NULL,
>> +	.suspend = NULL,
>> +	.resume = NULL,
>>      
> NULL initializers aren't required.
>
>    
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		   .name = "u6-gpio",
>> +		   },
>>      
> } should be aligned with the '.' of '.driver'.
>
> Lastly, I'm confused by this in a few places:
>
> 	local_irq_save(flags);
> 	writel(some value, register);
> 	local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> Is there a reason why this apparantly simple register write need IRQs to
> be disabled?
>
> I don't think this patch needs another review cycle, unless someone else
> wants to comment on it.
>