[PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add new CPU initialization support
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Fri Jul 16 07:52:19 EDT 2010
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:58:28PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9325ac2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
> +/* linux/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * http://www.samsung.com/
> + *
> + * Cloned from linux/arch/arm/mach-realview/platsmp.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2002 ARM Ltd.
> + * All Rights Reserved
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <asm/mach-types.h>
> +#include <asm/localtimer.h>
> +#include <asm/unified.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/smp_scu.h>
> +#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> +
> +extern void s5pv310_secondary_startup(void);
> +
> +/*
> + * control for which core is the next to come out of the secondary
> + * boot "holding pen"
> + */
> +volatile int __cpuinitdata pen_release = -1;
> +
> +static void __iomem *scu_base_addr(void)
> +{
> + return (void __iomem *)(S5P_VA_SCU);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int get_core_count(void)
> +{
> + void __iomem *scu_base = scu_base_addr();
> + if (scu_base)
> + return scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock);
> +
> +void __cpuinit platform_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + trace_hardirqs_off();
> +
> + /*
> + * if any interrupts are already enabled for the primary
> + * core (e.g. timer irq), then they will not have been enabled
> + * for us: do so
> + */
> + gic_cpu_init(0, gic_cpu_base_addr);
> +
> + /*
> + * let the primary processor know we're out of the
> + * pen, then head off into the C entry point
> + */
> + pen_release = -1;
> + smp_wmb();
> +
> + /*
> + * Synchronise with the boot thread.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&boot_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&boot_lock);
> +}
> +
> +int __cpuinit boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout;
> +
> + /*
> + * set synchronisation state between this boot processor
> + * and the secondary one
> + */
> + spin_lock(&boot_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * The secondary processor is waiting to be released from
> + * the holding pen - release it, then wait for it to flag
> + * that it has been released by resetting pen_release.
> + *
> + * Note that "pen_release" is the hardware CPU ID, whereas
> + * "cpu" is Linux's internal ID.
> + */
> + pen_release = cpu;
> + flush_cache_all();
> +
> + /*
> + * XXX
> + *
> + * This is a later addition to the booting protocol: the
> + * bootMonitor now puts secondary cores into WFI, so
> + * poke_milo() no longer gets the cores moving; we need
> + * to send a soft interrupt to wake the secondary core.
> + * Use smp_cross_call() for this, since there's little
> + * point duplicating the code here
> + */
> + smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu));
> +
> + timeout = jiffies + (1 * HZ);
> + while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + smp_rmb();
> + if (pen_release == -1)
> + break;
> +
> + udelay(10);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * now the secondary core is starting up let it run its
> + * calibrations, then wait for it to finish
> + */
> + spin_unlock(&boot_lock);
> +
> + return pen_release != -1 ? -ENOSYS : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init poke_milo(void)
> +{
> + /* nobody is to be released from the pen yet */
> + pen_release = -1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Write the address of secondary startup into the system-wide flags
> + * register. The BootMonitor waits for this register to become
> + * non-zero.
> + */
> + __raw_writel(BSYM(virt_to_phys(s5pv310_secondary_startup)), S5P_INFORM0);
> +
> + mb();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs
> + * which may be present or become present in the system.
> + */
> +void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int i, ncores = get_core_count();
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ncores; i++)
> + set_cpu_possible(i, true);
> +}
> +
> +void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> +{
> + unsigned int ncores = get_core_count();
> + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + int i;
> +
> + /* sanity check */
> + if (ncores == 0) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR
> + "Realview: strange CM count of 0? Default to 1\n");
> +
> + ncores = 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (ncores > NR_CPUS) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "Realview: no. of cores (%d) greater than configured "
> + "maximum of %d - clipping\n",
> + ncores, NR_CPUS);
> + ncores = NR_CPUS;
> + }
> +
> + smp_store_cpu_info(cpu);
> +
> + /*
> + * are we trying to boot more cores than exist?
> + */
> + if (max_cpus > ncores)
> + max_cpus = ncores;
> +
> + /*
> + * Initialise the present map, which describes the set of CPUs
> + * actually populated at the present time.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++)
> + set_cpu_present(i, true);
> +
> + /*
> + * Initialise the SCU if there are more than one CPU and let
> + * them know where to start. Note that, on modern versions of
> + * MILO, the "poke" doesn't actually do anything until each
> + * individual core is sent a soft interrupt to get it out of
> + * WFI
> + */
> + if (max_cpus > 1) {
> + /*
> + * Enable the local timer or broadcast device for the
> + * boot CPU, but only if we have more than one CPU.
> + */
> + percpu_timer_setup();
> +
> + scu_enable(scu_base_addr());
> + poke_milo();
> + }
> +}
Please can you model this on the Versatile Express platsmp.c rather than
the Realview platsmp.c ?
The Realview platsmp.c implementation contains a lot of left-overs from
the initial Integrator-based SMP implementation which we really shouldn't
be carrying endlessly forward.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list