tq 2440
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Jul 15 13:10:29 EDT 2010
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:35:26PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:16:30PM +0800, Conke Hu wrote:
> > > ever notice to the following kernel log?
> > > "Device 's3c2440-nand' does not have a release() function, it is
> > > broken and must."
> > > release() function should be implemented in the platform_device.
> >
> > That's not telling you to provide a release function. The warning is
> > telling you that a device is being unregistered which doesn't have a
> > release function.
> >
> > Consider this point - maybe it doesn't have a release function because
> > it's not supposed to be unregistered?
>
> Heh, well, it is being unregistered, and at that point in time, the
> kernel complains.
The unregistration occurs because platform_register_devices() (which is
used by arch code to register a block of platform devices) undoes its
work if one of the devices fails to register.
I've long since thought, since I created that function, that this probably
isn't desirable behaviour, and it should continue to register as many
devices as it possibly can.
> All kobjects need a release function that actually frees it. If not,
> that is a logic bug. Please see the Documentation/kobject.txt file for
> details.
How do you free a statically declared platform device?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list