[PATCH v6] libata: pata_samsung: Add Samsung PATA controller driver
Sergei Shtylyov
sshtylyov at mvista.com
Mon Jul 12 05:33:40 EDT 2010
Hello.
Kukjin Kim wrote:
> From: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan at samsung.com>
> Adds support for the Samsung PATA controller. This driver is based on the
> Libata subsystem and references the earlier patches sent for IDE subsystem.
> Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux at fluff.org>
There's probably still a place for improvement... sorry that I dind't
notice before. Other than that:
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov at mvista.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5718220
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,727 @@
[...]
> +/*
> + * pata_s3c_wait_after_reset - wait for devices to become ready after reset
> + */
> +static int pata_s3c_wait_after_reset(struct ata_link *link,
> + unsigned int devmask, unsigned long deadline)
> +{
> + struct ata_port *ap = link->ap;
> + struct ata_ioports *ioaddr = &ap->ioaddr;
> + unsigned int dev0 = devmask & (1 << 0);
> + unsigned int dev1 = devmask & (1 << 1);
> + int rc, ret = 0;
> +
> + msleep(ATA_WAIT_AFTER_RESET);
> +
> + /* always check readiness of the master device */
> + rc = ata_sff_wait_ready(link, deadline);
> + /* -ENODEV means the odd clown forgot the D7 pulldown resistor
> + * and TF status is 0xff, bail out on it too.
> + */
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* if device 1 was found in ata_devchk, wait for register
> + * access briefly, then wait for BSY to clear.
> + */
You don't call pata_s3c_devchk() for device 1, so in principle you can
drop the following block:
> + if (dev1) {
> + int i;
> +
> + pata_s3c_dev_select(ap, 1);
> +
> + /* Wait for register access. Some ATAPI devices fail
> + * to set nsect/lbal after reset, so don't waste too
> + * much time on it. We're gonna wait for !BSY anyway.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + u8 nsect, lbal;
> +
> + nsect = ata_inb(ap->host, ioaddr->nsect_addr);
> + lbal = ata_inb(ap->host, ioaddr->lbal_addr);
> + if ((nsect == 1) && (lbal == 1))
> + break;
> + msleep(50); /* give drive a breather */
> + }
> +
> + rc = ata_sff_wait_ready(link, deadline);
> + if (rc) {
> + if (rc != -ENODEV)
> + return rc;
> + ret = rc;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* is all this really necessary? */
> + pata_s3c_dev_select(ap, 0);
> + if (dev1)
> + pata_s3c_dev_select(ap, 1);
This too...
> + if (dev0)
> + pata_s3c_dev_select(ap, 0);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +static int pata_s3c_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct ata_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct s3c_ide_platdata *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + struct s3c_ide_info *info;
> +
> + info = host->private_data;
Could be initializer...
MBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list