[RFC 3/3] mm: iommu: The Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager
dwalker at codeaurora.org
Thu Jul 1 18:05:44 EDT 2010
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 15:00 -0700, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Additionally, the current IOMMU interface does not allow users to
> associate one page table with multiple IOMMUs unless the user explicitly
> wrote a muxed device underneith the IOMMU interface. This also could be
> done, but would have to be done for every such use case. Since the
> particular topology is run-time configurable all of these use-cases and
> more can be expressed without pushing the topology into the low-level
> IOMMU driver.
> The VCMM takes the long view. Its designed for a future in which the
> number of IOMMUs will go up and the ways in which these IOMMUs are
> composed will vary from system to system, and may vary at
> runtime. Already, there are ~20 different IOMMU map implementations in
> the kernel. Had the Linux kernel had the VCMM, many of those
> implementations could have leveraged the mapping and topology management
> of a VCMM, while focusing on a few key hardware specific functions (map
> this physical address, program the page table base register).
So if we include this code which "map implementations" could you
collapse into this implementations ? Generally , what currently existing
code can VCMM help to eliminate?
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel