[PATCH v4] davinci: Add MityDSP-L138/MityARM-1808 SOM support
Michael Williamson
michael.williamson at criticallink.com
Fri Aug 27 12:24:29 EDT 2010
On 08/27/2010 10:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Michael Williamson<michael.williamson at criticallink.com> writes:
>
>
>>> Normally, I like to see new board support broken down more. It's rather
>>> difficult to do a good review of new board file when everything is added
>>> in a single patch.
>>>
>>> Typically, a basic patch that just supports basic boot (typically to
>>> UART console) is the first patch. Then additional patches are added to
>>> add peripheral support (display, MMC, SPI, flash, regulators, ...)
>>>
>>> Breaking things up this way helps reviewers and maintainers greatly.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>> OK. Most of the board file is a large cut-and-paste of the da850
>> EVM. It seems unlikely that I'll have any measure of success here, but if
>> I get time I might try again.
>>
> OK, if it's mostly a cut-and-paste of da850, then maybe just break it up
> into two patches, 1) the cut, paste& rename patch and 2) a separate
> patch for things that are different on your board.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
I think I am going to try again. I intend to basically start over, leaving
the console UART, NAND, and EMAC (hardcoded to MII interface for now).
This is the minimum set of devices I need to get one of our base boards to
boot and mount a root filesystem and run some tests here.
I will remove all the ATAG garbage and anything that is runtime configurable
as well as the LCD, McASP, SPI, SPI-NOR, and I2C based peripherals. If the
patch is OK, then I'll add them back one by one for review.
Would this be a reasonable approach? And should I post it as a v5 to this
series or create a different series (given the large change of code)?
Should I pull the general ARM mailing list off the distribution as this
should
now be specific only to mach-davinci?
Thanks again for any insight.
-Mike
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list