[PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE
Shilimkar, Santosh
santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Fri Aug 27 00:46:54 EDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman at deeprootsystems.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:07 AM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED
> instead of MT_DEVICE
>
> Kevin Hilman <khilman at deeprootsystems.com> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
> > <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
> >> On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section
> >> mapping pre-requisite instead of intended MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED
> >>
> >> Since the section mapping limitation gets fixed with first
> >> patch in this series, the MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED can be used now.
> >>
> >> Have not tested this, so somebody with Davinci hardware can
> >> try this out
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> >> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com
> >> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman at deeprootsystems.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman at deeprootsystems.com>
>
> Also, FYI... while not a very thorough test, I boot-tested this series
> on DaVinci (dm355, omapl138) and it worked fine.
>
> I'll include in davinci git (in the davinci-testing branch) so it gets a
> bit more testing.
Thanks a lot Kevin!!
Tony,
Can you merge this in lo master as well. Actually I want all these
3 patches go together so that it doesn't break OMAP/DAVINCI.
Regards,
Santosh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list