[PATCH] MX3x: clean kpp resource structure definitions
Jason Wang
jason77.wang at gmail.com
Tue Aug 24 04:56:19 EDT 2010
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hallo Michael,
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:57:39AM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c
>> index a4fd1a2..a3e0fe2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c
>> @@ -374,12 +374,12 @@ struct platform_device imx_rtc_device0 = {
>>
>> static struct resource imx_kpp_resources[] = {
>> {
>> - .start = MX3x_KPP_BASE_ADDR,
>> - .end = MX3x_KPP_BASE_ADDR + 0xf,
>> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM
>> + .start = KPP_BASE_ADDR,
>> + .end = KPP_BASE_ADDR + SZ_4K - 1,
>> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> }, {
>> - .start = MX3x_INT_KPP,
>> - .end = MX3x_INT_KPP,
>> + .start = MXC_INT_KPP,
>> + .end = MXC_INT_KPP,
>> .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>> },
>> };
>>
:) The final goal is to build all i.MX platforms into a single kernel,
your change will add troubles for that.
Regards,
Jason.
> what ist the exact problem you want to fix? I'm OK with adding that
> comma and using SZ_4K (assuming you checked it in the reference
> manuals). But why s/MX3x_KPP_BASE_ADDR/KPP_BASE_ADDR/ ?
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list