[PATCH] ARM: S5PV310: Add CPU hotplug support for S5PV310

[Kukjin Kim]

From: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn at samsung.com>

This patch adds CPU hotplug support for S5PV310/S5PC210.

Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn at samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/hotplug.c |  144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/hotplug.c

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/hotplug.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..03652c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/hotplug.c
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/* linux arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/hotplug.c
+ *
+ *  Cloned from linux/arch/arm/mach-realview/hotplug.c
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2002 ARM Ltd.
+ *  All Rights Reserved
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+*/
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+
+#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+
+extern volatile int pen_release;
+
+static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_killed);
+
+static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
+{
+	unsigned int v;
+
+	flush_cache_all();
+	asm volatile(
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %1, c7, c5, 0\n"
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %1, c7, c10, 4\n"
+	/*
+	 * Turn off coherency
+	 */
+	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
+	"	bic	%0, %0, #0x20\n"
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
+	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
+	"	bic	%0, %0, #0x04\n"
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
+	  : "=&r" (v)
+	  : "r" (0)
+	  : "cc");
+}
+
+static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
+{
+	unsigned int v;
+
+	asm volatile(
+	"mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
+	"	orr	%0, %0, #0x04\n"
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
+	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
+	"	orr	%0, %0, #0x20\n"
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
+	  : "=&r" (v)
+	  :
+	  : "cc");
+}
+
+static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	/*
+	 * there is no power-control hardware on this platform, so all
+	 * we can do is put the core into WFI; this is safe as the calling
+	 * code will have already disabled interrupts
+	 */
+	for (;;) {
+		/*
+		 * here's the WFI
+		 */
+		asm(".word	0xe320f003\n"
+		    :
+		    :
+		    : "memory", "cc");
+
+		if (pen_release == cpu) {
+			/*
+			 * OK, proper wakeup, we're done
+			 */
+			break;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * getting here, means that we have come out of WFI without
+		 * having been woken up - this shouldn't happen
+		 *
+		 * The trouble is, letting people know about this is not really
+		 * possible, since we are currently running incoherently, and
+		 * therefore cannot safely call printk() or anything else
+		 */
+#ifdef DEBUG
+		printk(KERN_WARN "CPU%u: spurious wakeup call\n", cpu);
+#endif
+	}
+}
+
+int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	return wait_for_completion_timeout(&cpu_killed, 5000);
+}
+
+/*
+ * platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU
+ *
+ * Called with IRQs disabled
+ */
+void platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+#ifdef DEBUG
+	unsigned int this_cpu = hard_smp_processor_id();
+
+	if (cpu != this_cpu) {
+		printk(KERN_CRIT "Eek! platform_cpu_die running on %u, should be %u\n",
+			   this_cpu, cpu);
+		BUG();
+	}
+#endif
+
+	printk(KERN_NOTICE "CPU%u: shutdown\n", cpu);
+	complete(&cpu_killed);
+
+	/*
+	 * we're ready for shutdown now, so do it
+	 */
+	cpu_enter_lowpower();
+	platform_do_lowpower(cpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * bring this CPU back into the world of cache
+	 * coherency, and then restore interrupts
+	 */
+	cpu_leave_lowpower();
+}
+
+int platform_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	/*
+	 * we don't allow CPU 0 to be shutdown (it is still too special
+	 * e.g. clock tick interrupts)
+	 */
+	return cpu == 0 ? -EPERM : 0;
+}
-- 
1.6.2.5